{"id":16107,"date":"2015-04-17T23:56:07","date_gmt":"2015-04-18T03:56:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/?p=16107"},"modified":"2015-04-17T23:56:07","modified_gmt":"2015-04-18T03:56:07","slug":"on-the-negative-side-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/2015\/04\/on-the-negative-side-2\/","title":{"rendered":"On the negative side 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/SM-01s.jpg\" alt=\"don&#039;t drop your camera in the water\" width=\"400\" height=\"592\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-16108\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/SM-01s.jpg 400w, https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/SM-01s-1x1.jpg 1w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/>I guess I&#8217;m not shocking anyone when I say this is not how I intended this image to look at all. And it&#8217;s a shame, because it was a rare opportunity that might actually have come out with some artistic merit. <a href=\"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/2011\/11\/but-is-it-art\/\" target=\"_blank\">I know, right?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The scene opens on a casual photo competition on this thing that used to exist called, &#8216;Usenet,&#8217; that somehow died in favor of chatrooms (pretty much the same damn thing) and Tumbler and Reddit and such &#8211; don&#8217;t ask me, people are weird. The challenge for this week was to get an interesting photo with a disposable film camera, the basic premise being that <em>good<\/em> photographers could produce something compelling regardless of the equipment, which is a point I&#8217;ve often <a href=\"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/Tips\/Equipment.html\" target=\"_blank\">promoted<\/a> myself. These little plastic, inexpensive cameras were about as simple as they could get, and of course extremely limited in their abilities<strong>:<\/strong> single molded acrylic lenses, fixed shutter and aperture and focal length, questionable quality control and accuracy, and preloaded with a specific film. Nobody was expecting <em>National Geographic<\/em> images, but what <em>would<\/em> we be seeing?<\/p>\n<p>While I had used these from time to time before, because waterproof ones were available and, at that point in history, the only way to do subsurface or water-sports images without spending a lot of money on specialized equipment, the one I purchased for this attempt was <em>not<\/em> waterproof, but included a flash instead. I was out prowling around with the camera in a shirt pocket, and visiting one of my haunts in Florida, a wading-area that stayed shallow for hundreds of meters out, playing home to horseshoe crabs and <a href=\"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/River\/Manatees.html\" target=\"_blank\">manatees<\/a> and the occasional dolphin.<\/p>\n<p>I noticed that the light conditions were producing an effect that I&#8217;d used before, where looking downward into the water near my feet produced a clear view, but as my gaze went further up and out, the water gradually turned reflective and showed only the sky, producing a nice fading effect and color change &#8211; I was determined to capture this visual curiosity, and went in search of something under the surface to provide a focal point for the transparent water portion. With delight, I spotted a stingray not far away, and managed to get quite close to it without spooking it, an accomplishment of its own since they&#8217;re notoriously sensitive to movement in the water and don&#8217;t tend to hang around people. While the focal length listed for <a href=\"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/River\/Stingray.html\" target=\"_blank\">this one<\/a> seems short, it&#8217;s on an earlier small-sensor digital camera, and is an equivalent of 190mm, moderate telephoto.<\/p>\n<p>So I framed the image the way I wanted just as the stingray became aware of my presence and bolted &#8211; it&#8217;s barely visible in the photo, the only shape right at the edge where the water goes from green to purple (we&#8217;re getting to that &#8211; just be patient.) The ray is facing away, the tail towards the bottom left corner if that helps. Obviously my ability to keep the camera level in my haste left a bit to be desired, but I succeeded in nailing the stingray right at the transition from transparent to reflective. Cool!<\/p>\n<p>And then, a short while later while wading in the same location, I bent over to scoop up something at my feet and the camera vaulted out of my shirt pocket and into the water. I immediately snatched it up, but really wasn&#8217;t holding out much hope that the snap-together construction would be sufficient to prevent or even slow the incursion of saltwater into the depths of the camera, especially when the flash capacitor discharged into my hand as I picked it up (I do not recommend this experience, by the way &#8211; it&#8217;s a hefty amount of voltage and god will damn you to hell for cursing.) Nevertheless, I took it in to be developed, and managed to salvage a few images from early in the roll, tightly wrapped by successive layers of film. This, however, was not one of them, and the salt damage is rather prominent.<\/p>\n<p>There is a curious, somewhat illusory effect within, as well. The deep purple spot in the sky is not what happened to the sun, since I was facing north, but just a random reaction of the emulsion to the salt and mineral content &#8211; even though it appears to produce a <em>reflection<\/em> from the horizon beneath it. It&#8217;s just coincidence, but one that&#8217;s easy to slip past us because it mimics something we expect to see.<\/p>\n<p>This event occurred in those tumultuous days when digital was gaining popularity, and the early adopters were seeking any examples they could to denigrate film. This image <em>might<\/em> have caught their attention momentarily, until they realized that a digital camera would probably have fared a bit worse with the dunking&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I guess I&#8217;m not shocking anyone when I say this is not how I intended this image to look at all. And it&#8217;s a shame, because it was a rare opportunity that might actually have come out with some artistic merit. I know, right? The scene opens on a casual photo competition on this thing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1903,6,4,3],"tags":[1016,2809],"class_list":["post-16107","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-because","category-humor","category-nature","category-photo","tag-not-art","tag-unless-i-tell-you-it-is"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16107"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16107\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}