{"id":24668,"date":"2019-10-18T06:03:38","date_gmt":"2019-10-18T10:03:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/?p=24668"},"modified":"2019-10-18T01:03:50","modified_gmt":"2019-10-18T05:03:50","slug":"storytime-42","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/2019\/10\/storytime-42\/","title":{"rendered":"Storytime 42"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/SelfEye.jpg\" alt=\"the author&#039;s eye and reflection\" width=\"750\" height=\"563\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-24669\" \/><br clear=\"all\"\/>It was probably about 20 years ago when I picked up a book on close-up and macro photography, and discovered some of the varied methods of obtaining a very high order of magnification without actually having a lens dedicated to it, such as lens reversing and lens stacking. I experimented a little, but didn&#8217;t tackle the techniques too seriously for a while.<\/p>\n<p>Later on I was in Florida and using the borrowed Sony F-717, which had a fixed (non-interchangeable) 9.7-48.5mm zoom lens, or the &#8220;35mm equivalent&#8221; of a 38-190mm, evidence of how so many terms in photography suffer from inertia instead of thoughtful planning. Its macro performance wasn&#8217;t bad by itself, but the addition of an Olympus 50mm 1.4 lens reversed on the front, at certain focal lengths, could produce a <em>serious<\/em> amount of magnification, provided you were fine with some wicked focal vignetting (increased blurring in a circle towards the outer edges of the frame.) It was responsible for some of my <a href=\"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/Tank\/Barnacle.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">more interesting<\/a> shots.<\/p>\n<p>Then when I got my first digital camera, the Canon Pro-90 IS, I resurrected the technique on its own 7-70mm lens (37-370mm equivalent.) The difference in lens properties didn&#8217;t produce the same quality in results, but it still proved useful in certain circumstances. As well as some foolish experiments.<\/p>\n<p>Since the Pro-90 had a swing-out and reversible viewfinder LCD, it had a few more angles to exploit than the Sony, and one of them was photographing my own iris. This was still a bit challenging in that <em>a)<\/em> I had to remove my glasses to pull this off, which meant my focus wasn&#8217;t that hot, and <em>b)<\/em> I had to concentrate on one eye to see that viewfinder since the other was blocked by the camera and lens itself. I managed to get a couple of decently sharp images through all this, and more than a handful of rejects.<\/p>\n<p>The subtle and unintended effect that popped up was the reflection of the reversed 50mm lens in my cornea, almost perfectly centered on the pupil, which gives a somewhat robotic look to my eye. If your monitor brightness and gamma are set decently, you can even see a hint of the black &#8216;steps&#8217; of the lens ring going into the pupil, seeming to hint that something <em>else<\/em> might be down there.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve never tried this since, mostly because I no longer use that camera for anything and none of my others have the necessary LCD to focus with, though it occurs to me now that I actually <em>might<\/em> have a way of doing it. Or I could simply shoot someone else&#8217;s eye, but I should probably pick one with more dynamic color depth than &#8216;grey.&#8217; And get my hands out of the picture&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It was probably about 20 years ago when I picked up a book on close-up and macro photography, and discovered some of the varied methods of obtaining a very high order of magnification without actually having a lens dedicated to it, such as lens reversing and lens stacking. I experimented a little, but didn&#8217;t tackle [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1903,3,12],"tags":[5167,2751,1150,5165,5166,5168],"class_list":["post-24668","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-because","category-photo","category-random","tag-ill-be-bock","tag-iris","tag-lens-stacking","tag-pupil","tag-selfie","tag-the-retina-is-next"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24668","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24668"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24668\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24668"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}