{"id":33281,"date":"2022-11-22T06:00:16","date_gmt":"2022-11-22T11:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/?p=33281"},"modified":"2022-11-21T12:18:40","modified_gmt":"2022-11-21T17:18:40","slug":"visibly-different-part-47","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/2022\/11\/visibly-different-part-47\/","title":{"rendered":"Visibly different, part 47"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This one was inspired when I was going through the folders and realized I had a counterpart that was just done recently (like, since the last Visibly Different post.) We start back in October 2009.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/OrionEtAl1.jpg\" alt=\"night exposure moonlit self-portrait with Orion\" width=\"750\" height=\"1340\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-33282\" \/><br clear=\"all\"\/>Part of the reasoning behind this was wanting a portrait of myself to use for promotional purposes, only not <em>serious<\/em> ones &#8211; I&#8217;m never going to be a realtor so I don&#8217;t need the &#8216;warm smile in some studio&#8217; headshot, plus I scare people. This one was a self-portrait that didn&#8217;t quite work, so I eventually settled on the <a href=\"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/Sales.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">one seen here<\/a>, which probably should be updated.<\/p>\n<p>But it was also a moonlight experiment, and a &#8216;ghost image&#8217; one, since I was purposefully present for only part of the exposure, while the camera (the one in the frame &#8211; well, both, actually) was present the entire time &#8211; the idea was that the camera had a &#8216;real&#8217; presence while mine was incidental. <em>Hah!<\/em> Such fartistic commentary! Which would have worked much better against the open sky than the trees, which is largely why it wasn&#8217;t ever used. Except for the obvious reason that I scare people.<\/p>\n<p>By the way, despite the various shortcomings, this is a self-portrait, and <em>not<\/em> a fucking &#8216;selfie&#8217; &#8211; selfies are vain and inept things done with a smutphone and an absence of cognition. Know the difference.<\/p>\n<p>Now we come to this past Saturday morning.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/OrionEtAl2.jpg\" alt=\"night sky exposure semi-self-portrait\" width=\"750\" height=\"1099\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-33283\" \/><br clear=\"all\"\/>I just cropped this tighter from the version posted a few days back, to emphasize the similarities a little, because this is the exact same spot, and I&#8217;m <em>pretty<\/em> sure those are the exact same stars up there &#8211; I mean, they&#8217;d gotten out of my sight between the two frames, so I can&#8217;t rule out substitutions, but&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Unless you were really checking the background details, though, you might never realize that they <em>were<\/em> the same location (much less the same person.) The primary clue is the orientation of Orion at the lakeshore, pinning down the view direction and suggesting a closer look, but the lake is so different between the two, especially the water level, that it&#8217;s easy to slip past. The base color register throws things off, as does the focal length which shifts relative positions within the frame. The exposure time of course &#8211; the first pic was 25 seconds while the second was 303. Though it looks like that outermost tree has died in the intervening years, I think that&#8217;s actually a piling you see in the latter pic since it was shot at a slightly different angle. It&#8217;s clearly not intended to let us see the figure now, so the underlying &#8216;mood,&#8217; for want of a better word, has changed. And there&#8217;s the suggestion that the temperatures were significantly different, because despite what little you can tell from the shadowy figure in the latest pic, it&#8217;s obviously not in short sleeves&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><em>Woo hoo<\/em>, exciting, right boys and girls? Yeah, c&#8217;mon, it&#8217;s effectively winter here, except not the kind with snow (yet.) We&#8217;ve entered the slow season and the pics will reflect this. Hey, think how <em>I<\/em> feel&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>*     *     *<\/p>\n<p>A note about exposures like this<strong>:<\/strong> If you want to try them, the primary thing to keep in mind is relative light &#8211; it&#8217;s not the amount of time that something is within the frame that dictates its &#8216;strength,&#8217; but how much light it reflects. In the top frame, even though the camera is there throughout the exposure while I&#8217;m not, the camera only reflects highlights from its black surface, which were still much dimmer than the light reflecting from my hand, so I should have been in the frame much less time. The dark background didn&#8217;t help at all, and it should have been against clearer sky (I was purposefully keeping Orion in the frame, so this had an impact, plus the fact that I wasn&#8217;t <em>in<\/em> the frame while framing it.) The brightness of the clothing makes a difference. The best thing is to shoot a bunch of frames with varying percentages of your &#8216;ghost&#8217; within the frame &#8211; 20% of the total exposure time, then 40%, and so on (I think the bottom frame was 40%, but this was also a brighter background.) Holding still is paramount of course, and the closer the portrait the worse this will become. It may take a while (like multiple sessions) before you get the effect you were after. Or you may <a href=\"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/2019\/05\/storytime-21\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">snag it in one frame<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This one was inspired when I was going through the folders and realized I had a counterpart that was just done recently (like, since the last Visibly Different post.) We start back in October 2009. Part of the reasoning behind this was wanting a portrait of myself to use for promotional purposes, only not serious [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,3],"tags":[88,3798,106,2094,189,477,6969,676],"class_list":["post-33281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astronomy","category-photo","tag-ghosts","tag-jordan-lake","tag-moonlight-photography","tag-night-exposures","tag-night-sky-photography","tag-orion","tag-partial-exposures","tag-time-exposures"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33281\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}