{"id":78,"date":"2009-07-14T01:40:08","date_gmt":"2009-07-14T06:40:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/?p=78"},"modified":"2009-07-14T01:40:08","modified_gmt":"2009-07-14T06:40:08","slug":"the-problem-with-blogging","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/2009\/07\/the-problem-with-blogging\/","title":{"rendered":"The problem with blogging"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230;or perhaps, with certain people doing so.<\/p>\n<p>No, I&#8217;m not going to attack what other people choose to write about or how they do it. This is a blog &#8211; it&#8217;s supposed to be about <em>me!<\/em> ;-). What I&#8217;m starting to find now is that I don&#8217;t like writing something as a &#8220;stream of consciousness&#8221; or introducing an idea. I&#8217;m a personality type (I think, anyway) that likes to present something as a complete work and orderly concept, rather than as an initial thought. So, while I have ideas for posts that occur to me several times a week, I don&#8217;t like the idea of just hurling them out there. I much rather prefer a finished form.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s perhaps something good about this, in that I&#8217;m not writing something that I&#8217;m more likely to look at later and cringe (note that I said &#8220;likely&#8221;). I&#8217;m never really sure of how &#8220;public&#8221; such a thing is, at least at this stage &#8211; I might have four readers right now, so that counts as less public than many things I do for my job. But, perhaps, that may not always be the case, and will I feel comfortable with what I&#8217;ve written before?<\/p>\n<p>The problem with &#8220;finished form&#8221; is that, too often, there is no such thing for me. Some ideas that I have that I consider compelling just seem to lead further onwards. Do I pick a stopping point? Or should I try to flesh it out better and complete the path? If I choose the latter, I find that I&#8217;m now trying to write a complete magazine article, self-edited, with fact-checking and sources. While not a bad pursuit, that kind of defeats the purpose.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m also sensitive about writing something that I think is pretty cool, that&#8217;s actually been examined in depth by someone else &#8211; I feel like that&#8217;s just showcasing my ignorance (&#8220;Hey! What if we sliced bread ahead of time?!?!&#8221;). There&#8217;s a trap to this way of thinking, in that there are very few subjects that are unique. It&#8217;s the same kind of trap that I fall into with photography, and that I have actually argued against &#8211; the artist that insists on being unique has got a huge challenge ahead of them, and may only achieve &#8220;being weird.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And finally, there&#8217;s this last little concern: giving away an idea. I&#8217;m writing stuff for eventual publication right now, or so is the goal, and there&#8217;s a certain amount of competition to that. I have to be sure in my mind that I&#8217;m not going to want to develop some post idea further and do a full-blown article on it. First of all, having the same thing in short form on a blog seems to indicate to an editor that I have too few ideas (maybe? I could be imagining this), but it also could mean that someone who&#8217;s a faster writer runs with the idea before I do. This is probably the least of the worries, but it&#8217;s a factor nonetheless.<\/p>\n<p>So, my posts are less frequent than many &#8211; but that makes them better quality, right? Yeah, sure, that&#8217;s it&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, feel free to chime in with your own thoughts. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230;or perhaps, with certain people doing so. No, I&#8217;m not going to attack what other people choose to write about or how they do it. This is a blog &#8211; it&#8217;s supposed to be about me! ;-). What I&#8217;m starting to find now is that I don&#8217;t like writing something as a &#8220;stream of consciousness&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,6,12,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-critic","category-humor","category-random","category-rant"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wading-in.net\/walkabout\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}