Tip Jar 41: Check them!

Okay, this is one that I do not have mastered well enough yet, and still get caught on – not often, but more often than I should, given how long I’ve been doing this. And it’s simple: Check your settings!

As in, each time you take the camera out of the bag, and each time you put it back (either one would be enough, if done consistently, but both is a safety margin.) It’s not a bad idea to ‘normalize’ your settings routinely, either, but pick something and make a habit of it.

What I mean is, know exactly what mode your camera is in, what options, what exposure, what compensation, and so on, before you start snapping frames. It’s easy to have a situation where you want to get the picture as fast as possible, just switching on and focusing before the opportunity is gone, but this does you no good at all if the settings are such that the images won’t come out decently. I suspect I get caught because I have a fairly routine collection of settings, especially for macro work, but enough situations where I deviate for particular reasons. So at the very least, give the LCD the once-over, paying attention to those little details that can trip you up – I’ll provide a short list, but this is geared more towards my own shooting style and demands, and your priorities might be different, so adjust as needed.

settings screen on back LCD of Canon 7D
They’re all right there, easy to check, and you should know what each of these mean. There’s a sneaky little indicator of condition in there, too – can you spot it?

Mode: I’m usually in one of two modes for 90% of my shooting: Aperture Priority, and Manual. Virtually never in Program Auto, and I don’t think I’ve ever used the touristy modes depicted by little icons/emojis, what I call the Ducky-Horsey modes. On occasion when I switch to Shutter Priority or Bulb, however, these will mess me up unless I’m checking.

ISO: Again, most often at 250 for detail, and switching usually means I’m doing more low-light stuff. I don’t forget this often, but on occasion…

White Balance: I almost went past this one, since I virtually never change it, not liking how the camera manages it most times, but it can really shift your images if it’s wrong for conditions.

Exposure Compensation: Probably the most common one missed, both because I switch it so often and because the indicator is subtle. For many situations I’m trying to recognize what effect the subject and background are going to have on the camera’s automatic exposure setting (in Aperture Priority of course,) and will be tweaking this to try and produce the best results. Usually, it’s not more than 2/3 of a stop, which isn’t too bad, until the subject/setting really calls for going in the opposite direction. Most times when I’m caught on this, however, is when I’m switching back and forth between birds in the sky and against a darker background, like deep in the foliage or against the dark foliage reflecting off of the water. I’m usually in Canon’s Evaluative Metering, which does indeed compare the focus point against the surrounding frame and should automatically compensate for this, but too often, the subject in the focus point is much smaller than the area around it that Canon reads from, so it’s usually setting exposure for the background, i.e., the bright sky.

Custom Modes: On Canons this is ‘Picture Style,’ of which I’m usually using one of three, all set for specific lighting conditions: Normal, Low Contrast/Saturation, and High Contrast/Saturation. The latter two are set to oppose existing conditions to keep things under control, i.e., in high contrast conditions like bright sunlight, I switch to Low Contrast/Saturation to help prevent blowouts or inky-dark shadows, but will use the opposite when the light is overcast or muted.

settings on Sigma 180mm f3.5 macroLens settings: This is an insidious one, because it usually doesn’t show unless you turn the camera body to look at the lens barrel. Autofocus may be switched on or off, stabilization on or off, or the focus limiter set for something other than what you want. Stabilization is the trickiest, because you may not discover until you unload the images that it was switched off…

By the way, I will insert something here as a bonus tip. If you’re in an area where you’re switching back and forth between a general-purpose wider-angle lens, and a telephoto, it’s often a good idea to revert to the telephoto as a default, switching lenses even when the situation doesn’t immediately call for it. Here’s the reasoning: telephoto subjects like birds, deer, bears, etc. may pop up suddenly and present only a fleeting chance, not waiting around you for to do the lens change, while the wider-angle subjects, and even the macro ones, are typically less demanding that you get the shot within a few seconds or they’re gone, and will give you time to switch. It may mean more lens changes than is absolutely necessary, which does increase the odds of introducing dust into the interiors of both lens and camera body, but this habit has stood me well many times over. Ideally of course, you’d have two camera bodies and so both lenses are mounted, and you’ve at least seen photographers with two or more cameras at the ready. This is heavy and awkward, however, and I have yet to do a full session like this, especially since I can’t stand camera straps and hanging the damn things around my neck; when the long lens is mounted, camera and lens usually remain in hand, and then, where would I put them when I need the wide-angle camera? When the lens is detached, though, it gets stowed in a long lens case.

Other things to be aware of:

Metering Modes: Especially switching to Spot Metering, which is very easy to forget is in use, and it usually requires a certain presence of mind to be using in the first place.

Focus Modes: I don’t switch these often at all, but you might, and if you do, keep an eye on them.

Auto-Bracketing: There’s nothing more annoying than firing off three or more frames when you’re trying for candid or specifically-timed shots.

Menu and Custom Function Settings: In my own cases, this is most often Mirror Lock-up or higher frame rates, but things like Flash Sync mode, Flash Compensation, Noise Reduction, button assignments, and so on. Going from Mirror Lock-up to trying to track a bird flying past is seriously annoying, not to mention next to impossible as the viewfinder blacks out on the first shutter press, and while a second press will trip it as intended, you’ll have no idea where the bird is.

Arca-Swiss style quick-release plate and screwdriver on keyringQuick-release plates: This is a sneaky one if you’ve gotten used to them, and there’s nothing worse than getting someplace remote to set up on a tripod and finding out you removed the mounting plate earlier when you were using a flash bracket – this has made me not only carry an extra plate or two in the camera bag, the flash bracket now attaches to the quick release plate.

By the way, I now have a custom ‘screwdriver’ blade attached to my keyring specifically to tighten and loosen QR plates, because I rarely carry coins anymore and those little loops provided on the mounting screws are nowhere near enough to tighten a plate properly – they need to be cranked down.

What’s in the bag: If there’s something that you normally carry and you remove it for whatever reason, impress it upon your mind fiercely to put it back as soon as possible. This could be the QR plates previously mentioned, batteries, rain ponchos, your remote release, flash cords – whatever. if you’re almost anxious that you took it out in the first place, this is not a bad frame of mind to have, since such things are easy to forget and never notice until you’re on location and need them.

The Gig Check: Hoo boy, if you’re heading out on a paid assignment or a specific shooting situation, sit down and go over everything – have a list if it helps. Batteries charged, extra memory cards (or plenty of film,) all lenses in place, all accessories you might need handy, camera(s) and lenses clean and easy to access, special items added. This should also include backup equipment and contingencies for any failures, so yes, at least a second body and lenses to cover all likely focal lengths. Also, clothing you might need – I even carry spare sandals in the car when on student outings, since I had a blowout once and had to have The Girlfriend bring me another pair. Hat, sunscreen, water, parka, bear repellent, flare gun, portable helicopter – it’s easy to become overloaded, but bad if you need it and don’t have it, and if you’re under contract, this can have legal ramifications.

So, I reiterate: check those settings, and develop good habits to make it automatic. Even keep some of those frames where you didn’t, and the shot was ruined because of it, to remind yourself – it really does help. Good luck!

Did you spot that key element? It’s the aperture setting, reading “F00,” meaning a lens isn’t attached – or, in this case, a manual-focus lens not even intended for this camera, the Mamiya 80mm macro on an adapter.

Just takes the right motivation

I knew this holiday was coming up and was wondering if I’d be able to celebrate it effectively, but I should never have doubted myself; I’m up for such challenges. So since today is Spot a South American Rodent Outside of a Zoo Day, there weren’t a lot of choices on how to tackle this, but one in particular stuck out, and I managed to finish the video clip in time to recognize the holiday. The story lies within:

For the record, this is a nutria, sometimes called a coypu (Myocastor coypus.) They’re not native anyplace but South America, though they’d been introduced to North America for both meat and fur farming. My understanding is, they’re still farmed for meat in a few places in Louisiana because, you know, Louisiana, but for the most part the ones that can be found are the distant ancestors of escaped and released individuals, decades ago.

Back in 2000 I believe, I’d done a ‘fishing’ trip to Portsmouth Island and noticed the trails through the high marsh grasses, wondering what had made them; they were too big for muskrats or opossums, too low through the grasses (almost like tunnels) for deer, and the island not wooded enough for beavers, not to mention surrounded by salt water. It was only when I was on my way back on the ferry that a local resident informed me these were produced by, “nutra” [sic], frustrating me since I would have staked out some likely areas the previous nights. A few years later, I’d heard they could be seen in the evening twilight from the deck of a restaurant on the Nag’s Head causeway, and mentioned such to my brother on the way over this past trip. Perhaps an hour or so afterward, after finding the same trails through the grasses around Bodie Island, we encountered Junior here. The video title is tongue-in-cheek of course, since the photographing and videoing of this individual was effortless.

This specimen was the same size as an average beaver, which many passers-by thought it to be, but at least this one gave us a great view of the same kind of teeth while the resident beavers never did. Both my brother and I maintained a safe distance, able to vault onto the boardwalk before the nutria could charge us, should it be so inclined, and even my venturing down from the boardwalk was done after I’d passed within three meters and had evoked no response whatsoever – it’s clear this one was used to tourists, damn near oblivious to us. Right as I closed the video, the nutria marched directly to the boardwalk and passed underneath the feet of several people standing thereon.

I was certainly pleased with this capture for the brief weekend trip, and could happily celebrate today’s holiday because of it. Worked out pretty well, I’d say.

This guy

In sorting photos the other day, I’m fairly certain I found the little shit that’s been infecting so many people around the country, the lazy sod that became a super-spreader through a lack of personal hygiene. Take a look at this guy:

foreleg of green treefrog Hyla cinerea pretty damn filthy
You tell me: has this guy ever washed his damn hands?

Seriously, this is the way that I found him, clinging to the storm door of the back porch – it’s lucky he even had the tackiness to stick. I’m pretty sure you can make out individual bacteria in there. Makes me recall (involuntarily) the days when my nieces were feeding themselves in their high-chairs – nobody would let me bring the hose into the house, though I argued persuasively about both the time-saving and the amusement factors. The back feet were impressive too, in a completely disgusting way.

hindleg of green treefrog Hyla cinerea ever worse
This – is why it’s a bad idea to require people to take their shoes off when they enter your house. I’ve seen cleaner lollipops that had been dropped on the carpet of a dog-filled home. Cleaning out the bathroom sink trap is less disgusting. But that’s today’s frog mothers for ya – just plop the eggs down into the pond and forget about ’em, it’s somebody else’s problem now. Appalling.

I hadn’t been trying to illustrate Infectious Irwin here, I was just after the detail of the feet while he was displaying them against the glass, and there are probably few applications for these particular photos (unlike, you know, all of the other creepy damn things that I shoot.) Finding out just how filthy treefrogs, or at least this one, really are was an unintended bonus – sure, they look all slick and shiny from a moderate distance, but this should keep you from shaking hands with one.

But there was one more detail that I inadvertently captured.

closeup of green treefrog Hyla cinerea eye showing shadow of toe in flash reflection
It’s subtle and would escape the attention of many unless I pointed it out, but there’s a round, soft-white reflection of the macro softbox on the eye – blocked by a toe of the treefrog. Actually, there are three blocking the softbox light, but the middle one is most distinct – yeah, that wasn’t lost on me. I have to assume this is one of our ‘educated Republicans.’ Probably dead now.

All that aside, there has been little to relate herein, and I’m only involved in various projects myself, mostly things around the house and this isn’t a DIY blog, so you’re spared. I did try and go out last night as a spate of thundercells moved across the state, but they mostly passed north of Walkabout Estates and didn’t show any distinctive lightning, plus the wind was blowing a fine misty rain directly into the lens, so I wrapped it up quickly. So, yeah. There is a holiday coming up I believe, so we at least can look forward to that exuberant celebration and caroling and… stuff.

Just… one, really

profile of great egret Ardea alba
I have a handful of photos from an outing today, but I’m winding down and still have other things to get done tonight, so this is a quick one that’s been sitting in the blog folder. Stay with me, it gets much more exciting.

Okay, no it doesn’t. But stay with me anyway.

When I’m sorting through recent photos to see what to keep and what to discard, right before shifting them into appropriate categories, I usually look at the images at full resolution to see if the sharpness is adequate. Some months back I began using a Canon 7D, and the jump in resolution was noticeable (and don’t ask me what it actually is, because I don’t know – that’s not the kind of thing that I worry about.) With earlier bodies, I could still see most of the subject when I did this, just filling the monitor screen, but now I see just a small portion – and I’m even using a much bigger monitor now. [Note that this is still far from being those desktop rigs that you see where someone has three two-meter wide monitors spread across their desk – I only have one, and it has about a 50cm active display width, but this does mean that I have some room to move the various editing menus aside and see more of the photo that I’m working on.]

There is probably a small degree that this resolution is detrimental, because I might reject an image as ‘not quite sharp enough’ when it has more than enough to print at a decent size – I’m just examining it too closely, and this especially holds true for images that will display full-frame, uncropped and not dependent on detail, like many scenics. However, maintaining sharpness even at high magnification, full resolution, means that I can crop the image, significantly sometimes, and not suffer from pixelation or ‘grain’ issues.

And as I’m doing this close examination, every once in a while one jumps out at me, such as the great egret (Ardea alba) above. That’s the entire frame up there, taken with the Tamron 150-600mm at 450mm while the bird was being cooperative; a lot of the images of the session lacked sharpness, suffering from inexact focus or motion blur, or both. But this one held up pretty well when seen at full resolution, which is shown below.

full resolution inset of same image of great egret Ardea alba
Yeah, that passes muster.

Per the ancient lore, part 33

unidentified snail snoozing on water reed[Yawn] Yeah, sorry, we’re back in the Invertebrates folder again, which certainly got off to a slow start; even now, I don’t add a lot to it, but back then I could go a couple of years without getting any photos of a snail or slug (which might have been a good thing, considering what I get up to now.) And so, this one was taken with my first actual digital camera, the Canon Pro90 IS, one of many such offerings that were soon surpassed by models appearing only a couple of years later – obsolescence can occur quickly in the digital camera realm. I took plenty of photos with that rig before I got my first DSLR body, but I was still concentrating on film for the quality shots at that time.

I was at a loss as to where this was taken for a bit, until I did a little poking around in the other folders for images with the same date, which soon reminded me: this was at River Road Park in Wilmington, NC, right alongside the Cape Fear River, and taken in 2006. Overnight, the snails would forage along the banks and water reeds, but as daylight arrived they would occasionally just hole up right where they were. Near as I can tell, they attach themselves to such perches with a variant of the mucus that they exude to facilitate their movement, in this case something that dries into a kind of glue; it might be the same stuff that they will seal the opening with to keep the moisture in, which I’ll feature here at some point later on. Are they sleeping when this occurs? Couldn’t begin to tell you – I don’t know if snails actually sleep, but what else they gonna do? Play video games? Update their blogs?

Obviously, I had to get down pretty low for this shot – or at least, the camera did. Since the Pro90 IS had an articulated LCD screen, I could hold the camera at wild angles and still frame the shot with the screen aimed conveniently, while not having to grovel in the mud and sand quite so much – something that I can’t do right now with any of the DSLR bodies that I use. I never recommend using the LCD screen for framing a shot, because it usually means holding the camera in an unsteady manner that can lead to camera shake and blurred shots, but there are times when it’s useful, especially if you remain aware of the downsides. Here, it permitted me to take advantage of the blue sky and the light angle that brought out the texture of the shell – not high art, but could have been much more boring, you know?

Just because, part 20

red-bellied water snake Nerodia erythrogaster basking before molting
I have a handful of pics from a recent outing to post, and while this one came from the same outing, it is notably different from the others and kinda “out of theme,” but I liked it too much to let it go. This is a red-bellied water snake (Nerodia erythrogaster,) a good-sized specimen, basking in the morning sunlight at Mason Farm Biological Reserve. Now that the nights are getting pretty chilly but it’s not yet hibernation time, this is a more common sight, as mostly nocturnal snakes bring their body temperatures back up to assist in their digestion. This particular one was very close to molting, as indicated by those cloudy eyes – in a day or so, it would shed its skin and become much more brightly-colored for a while. While their vision is hampered by this state, snakes tend to be much more defensive, and with water snakes this is a typical temperament anyway, so handling was out of the question – escaping without getting bitten would have been next to impossible. This species is harmless, by the way, and a bite would have drawn little droplets of blood and nothing further, but there really wasn’t a point to picking it up.

More will be along shortly, but I didn’t want to deprive you of the lovely textures brought out by the low sun angle any longer than I had to. You can thank me later on.

Monday color 38

monkshood Aconitum blossomsFor this week’s Monday color, we rely on the brilliance of Aconitum blossoms, otherwise known by a zillion different names such as monkshood, wolf’s bane, devil’s bane, Queen of All Poisons, and flake attractor, the last of which is my own, coined after seeing the woo-related claims and usages for the plant that can be found online. While purported to have countless different properties over the centuries, the only two that can be supported with any accuracy are a) that the plant is toxic to a fair degree, and b) the flowers are usually colorful. Many medicinal claims have been made for species throughout the botanical kingdom, and most are anecdotal at best; despite the avowals of numerous naturopathic and mystic flakes, science has not ignored such claims at all, but has tested the majority of them under controlled conditions (meaning, not subject to subjectivity, small sample sizes, and the placebo effect.) The few that actually showed dependable results, like salicylic acid and quinine, quickly became known as, “medicine.” Thus, when you hear phrases such as, “alternative medicine,” or, “traditional medicine,” these can easily be translated to, “not even close to medicine.” Just a little pointer to save you some time.

I’ve shown these flowers before (twice,) but both of those times were in bright sunlight conditions; this time around, it was overcast, so the color is coming courtesy of the flash, which did a much better job of it I think. Taken at the same time as this post just a couple weeks back, I didn’t try to shoot them in the overcast light to show what the effect on the colors would be – most likely, the slow shutter speed would have made the images not very impressive anyway. We’ll stick with this one.

That’s not right

I’ve had this image kicking around for a few years now, so I figured I’d feature it as a bump while I’m away, hopefully getting some new images.

In nearby Duke Forest, there’s a tree that developed in a rather curious way, one that (as a complete non-botanist or -arborist or -treeist,) I cannot attempt to explain. Perhaps someone has been dumping cthulhu into the creek. Anyway, what you’re seeing here is largely all the same tree, even the blotchy blob in the foreground. Towards the bottom, and again to the right, are two sizable stones that I’m fairly certain I couldn’t lift myself, but the Ent seems to be a bit maternal towards them. If you are doubting your own eyes (or suspecting my Photoshop skills,) clicking on the image will provide a higher resolution version. This unsavory miscegenation of vegetation and phlegm has been thriving quite happily for the several years in which I’ve hurriedly passed it by. Even the companion plants growing within its unholy embrace cannot disguise what is probably the entrance to the underworld, or perhaps the dread lair of the Fraggles. Just the mere mention begat their arcane chanting within your head, didn’t it?

So, when my posts halt and you hear of central Carolina under the onslaught of Squishington, you now have some idea how it happened. Meanwhile, I’ll continue to de-convert all those who insist that the beauty of nature is proof of god’s existence by showing them this image. It hasn’t failed yet.