Rehab x 8

It’s that time of the year, the time when the critters are getting more active and birthing their bebbies and all that, so we revisit our now-annual post on the topic of wildlife rehabilitation, in the hopes that it helps someone out there handle their unexpected situation a little bit better. Below begins the content first written in 2013 and still quite topical.

I used to work in this field a fair amount, both in administration of wildlife organizations and as an active raptor [birds of prey] rehabilitator, plus I served as wildlife adviser in several different situations. So I’m familiar with most of the more common reactions people have when they find ‘orphaned,’ injured, and ill wildlife. It’s hard to give enough useful information without trying to cover every situation or alternative, so treat this as an overview. One thing that I especially want to emphasize here is that there is an immediate emotional response in most cases, which tries to override the advice given by those who work in the fields, so be aware of it. There isn’t an ‘instinct’ we might have that applies to wildlife, and the rational mind is the part that needs to take control.

Additionally, the amount of folklore regarding wildlife is not just abundant, in most cases it’s ridiculously wrong. I’m not even going to say, “If in doubt…,” because you should doubt right off the bat, and consider that most of what you’ve heard is highly suspect. This means, contact someone who is supposed to know, and go with their advice.

Number one rule, and I can’t repeat this enough: Don’t try to raise wildlife on your own. Their diets are specialized, their needs varied and specific to the species, and their adult behavior dependent on how they’re raised. This isn’t the place for guesswork or experimentation. Even if they seem to be ‘doing well’ (like the viral video of the guy raising a baby hummingbird,) they may have developmental issues from an improper diet or exercise, or simply have imprinted on the wrong species, and you are in essence just prolonging the death of the animal. In the US, it’s illegal to raise any species without a specific permit, and songbirds are federally protected. It’s possible to obtain these permits, and quite frankly encouraged, because there are few places with enough rehabbers, but if you’re going to do it, do it right. More further down.

So, we’re about to enter baby bird season, and this accounts for a large percentage of wildlife encounters. I’ll dispel the first myth that touching a baby bird will cause the mother to abandon it. Utter hogwash, pure and simple – yet, I don’t always discourage parents from teaching this to their children, because it’s one way to try and get kids to leave them alone, which is a good thing. Better, perhaps, to teach them to leave them alone for the right reasons, which is to avoid interrupting their feeding schedule, or injuring them, or thinking it would be neat to have a pet robin. But returning to the myth, baby birds will occasionally fall from the nest, and it’s perfectly fine to return them to it, and in fact this is recommended.

It doesn’t always work, however. Some species will discard young that are not doing well, and some even kick their own siblings out – this is nature’s method of selecting the most viable offspring, as ruthless as we find it, and we’re not going to change it. Basically, if it’s a baby bird not ready to leave the nest (not fledged; we’ll return to this,) put it back. If it keeps coming out, there may not be much you can do.

Can’t reach the nest? Try to find a way, first. If that’s not possible, occasionally the parents will accept a substitute nest, such as a plastic berry basket with soft tissue as bedding – this should be placed as close as possible to the original nest, firmly anchored so it doesn’t come down. Observe the nest carefully, but from a safe distance, for 30-60 minutes to see if the parents have indeed found the substitute. If not, seek out a rehabilitator or wildlife official.

Abandoned nest? Maybe, maybe not. Once the eggs hatch, the parent birds go into feeding mode, gathering food constantly during daylight hours and stopping at the nest for brief periods to jam it down the gullets of their ravenous progeny. The 30-60 minute rule above is because waiting less may mean you’ve simply missed the brief feeding period between the extended gathering periods. Observation has to be done at a distance that does not alarm the parents – minimum is six meters (yards,) and more is recommended. Also, being low key is paramount, so take a seat (with binoculars, for preference) and remain still and quiet. Yes, it’s boring, but it’s for the health of the offspring, and if you didn’t care about that you wouldn’t be reading ;-)

fledglingsAs the nestlings become fledglings, they abandon the nest on their own in learning how to fly. This does mean that they’ll be found unable to fly, fluttering around at low level and even just sitting there staring at you. This is normal, and they should remain undisturbed. The parents are nearby, providing food and encouraging the flight attempts. Most bird species know enough not to give away their progeny’s locations to predators, or draw attention to themselves by moving a lot, so your ability to approach, or not being attacked by angry parents when you do so, means nothing at all. Again, observation is good here, as is knowing the calls of the species in question – the parents may be coaching their young towards them.

Now, telling the difference in ‘nestlings’ and ‘fledglings.’ A nestling is a baby bird that must remain in the nest for a while; they will have few feathers, or perhaps even odd ‘quills,’ which is what the feathers look like as they are growing out. Unable to support itself? Eyes not open? Nestling. Fledglings are the babies that are ready to learn how to fly. Their feathers will have good coverage with little to no stragglers or ‘stuffing coming out’ (the baby down.) One rule I always used over the phone was to ask if there were tail feathers – if there are, they’re about ready to fly. These are fledglings and should only be observed.

If in doubt, contact a rehabber/official. This is before doing anything else, save for getting it out of immediate danger. No food, no water, nothing at all. I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve heard people say, “We’ve tried giving it water and worms” – birds can aspirate the water if it’s not given the way the parents do (you’ve noticed the beak getting jammed halfway down the throat, right?) and only one species in North America eats earthworms. Again, folklore – ignore it and be safe.

Also, bleeding in birds is serious, no matter what. Birds have very thin blood that doesn’t coagulate easily, and they can bleed out quickly. Also note that those ‘quills’ of new feathers mentioned above have a blood supply for a while, and these can be broken and start bleeding as well. Time is important in such situations.

HappyOwletBaby raptors will tear you up – they know how to use the beak and talons very early (often on their siblings) and will not hesitate to protect themselves. And adult raptors will protect their young. This is where it’s best to leave it to the experienced.

And it may seem funny to have to say this, but baby birds do not look like their parents. Adult kestrels and screech owls, both diminutive raptors, are often considered “babies” when found by those not familiar with what a real juvenile looks like. Basic rule: if it has a smooth appearance and good coverage of feathers, it’s at least fledgling age, probably older.

What about mammals? This is a little different – mammals are generally not found away from their parents unless something has gone wrong. Most especially, if the youngster’s eyes aren’t open, they’re wet from the rain or dew, or if they’re cold or dehydrated, this is the time to contact someone. Test for dehydration by gently pinching up the skin over the shoulders or side in a ‘tent’ and releasing – if the skin takes more than a second to go back into position, this is dehydration.

Always use gloves. Juvenile mammals can certainly bite, and there’s an additional risk to this: rabies is active throughout much of North America. This is an invariably fatal disease once it passes a certain point (much more so than HIV,) so this needs to be taken seriously. It is not just the bite that can transmit it, but contact of an infected animal’s saliva with mucous membranes can introduce it as well, which means that picking up a damp animal and rubbing your eyes puts you at risk. Animals do not have to be showing symptoms to be infectious, and symptoms vary anyway. BE SAFE.

It’s not just rabies. Mammals are far more likely to introduce other zoonotic issues than birds – they’re enough like us that parasites (internal and external) and some viruses can be transmitted to us. Bringing them into the house may mean you just introduced fleas, lice, giardia, and so on into your home. You’ve been warned.

possumpeepingAlso, and it pains me to have to always say this, but cute does not mean safe. Any animal can defend itself. I have never been bitten by a raccoon, despite their aggressiveness, but I have a scar and a touch of nerve damage from a grey squirrel – one, moreover, that was raised in a house. Rabbits and mice can bite the hell out of you. Shrews even have a toxic saliva. Yes, I am trying to scare you – if you’re scared, you’re cautious, which is better than incautious.

In many cases, mammals about half of the adult size can be on their own without issues – they learn how to forage for their own food reasonably quickly. Again, the stillness thing doesn’t mean they’re lost – it may simply mean they’re trying not to attract attention. This is especially so for white-tailed deer fawns – they often curl up in the grass and conserve energy while mom forages, and will not move even when someone approaches – occasionally not even when picked up. Leave them be, and come back in a few hours. If they’re still there, that’s when you should contact someone.

Rabbits are notorious for abandoning the nest if it’s been disturbed, even with a full brood of young within. This is doubly hazardous because their nests are often in clumps of grass and can be inadvertently discovered by cleaning the yard. If it happens, immediately put everything back as it was, without touching the young, and place a few distinctive blades of grass across the nest opening (preferably something you can see from at least a short distance away,) then leave it entirely alone. Come back in a few hours and check to see if the grass has been moved. If it has, things are probably okay. If not, it may be time to check the warmth and hydration of the young. Contact a rehabilitator.

Again, trying to raise them yourself puts them at a high risk. This is especially true for rabbits, which are among the hardest mammals to raise in North America. I can’t count the number of people who have assured me that they did it once before, so “they know how to do it.” While this may be true, it ignores numerous things, such as how viable the released offspring were and whether they lasted longer than a month, whether they had developmental deficiencies because of improper nutrition, and even whether they had habituated to food or behavior that left them ill-prepared for their conditions. There is a shortage of rehabilitators, so believe me, if it was easy most people would be encouraged to tackle this on their own. The fact that not only is it discouraged, it is unlawful in most areas, should be a good indication that there’s something more to consider. And the welfare of the animal should take higher precedence than anyone’s ego.

Injured animals are extra dangerous. Yes, they may seem incapacitated or helpless, but you know what they say about appearances. One of my colleagues rashly checked an injured, near-comatose squirrel bare-handed, and it bit through her finger, joining its teeth together in the fleshy part of her index finger – I actually heard them grinding together. It then passed out without letting go. Animals in pain (even pets) often respond aggressively – they have no concept of your attempts to help them, and restraint can make them even more agitated. Deer can do vast amounts of damage by thrashing with their hooves, and the big waterfowl like herons and cranes can drive that beak into your face (and yes, they aim for effectiveness.) I really want to emphasize this, because the nurturing instincts are badly misplaced here, and extreme caution is necessary instead.

“There’s a nest of animals in my attic/crawlspace/walls and they need to be removed!” No. Most especially not when they’re raising young, which is most often when anyone notices them. Once the young are there, no further damage is going to be done to your house, because the parents are concentrating on raising their brood. Trying to relocate them is hazardous, both to the animals and to people in many cases, and pointless. Let them be, and in a few weeks the young will be old enough and move out on their own – about the only exception to this is bat colonies (more below.) Once there are no young to raise, the adult animals often leave on their own – nests are primarily for young – but they can also be encouraged to leave or stay out at that point. Squirrels are pretty bad about wanting to return to successful nest areas, and will even chew through wire mesh at times, but most others take the hint and find better places to live.

“But what about rabies?” Animals raising young, even in the eaves of your house, are not an especially high risk. Contrary to belief, rabies does not cause animals to leap suddenly out and attack people; those events are remarkably rare. While anyone should be quite cautious of any mammals that openly approach, living near them does not place anyone at special risk – you’re at greater risk of being killed by the tree near the house falling on you, and we won’t even talk about road risks. Like snake bites, most contacts with rabies vector wildlife occurs by people initiating the contact.

beaverspoor“Animals are doing damage to my property and need to be removed!” No. I can’t tell you how much this attitude annoys me, but that’s what a blog is for, right? Wildlife goes where the habitat is ideal, and pays no attention to humankind’s imaginary idea of “property.” First off, anyone should enjoy the opportunity to see behavior, something that is often hard to accomplish even when making the effort. If someone has wildlife around, chances are they aren’t in a high-rise apartment, which means they wanted to live with at least some vestige of nature visible; surprise surprise, it comes with other animals. While we might decry the damages to our gardens or landscaping, that’s part of the territory, just like road noise and power lines. Learn how to cope, and the ways to exclude animals from certain areas so we can have tomatoes. I’m sorry that a $500 tree was stripped, but no one should have planted something that was that appealing to the local species in the first place, and chances are, numerous appropriate trees had been cut down first so that the fancy landscaping could be put in its place (and I used to work for a landscaper, too.)

Trapping and removal is rarely effective. If there’s a habitat, someone else will move in. And wildlife populations have been shown through numerous studies to be fairly self-regulating; the issues come because habitat destruction by humans is not. We can put in housing developments much faster than the natural cycles of population reduction and management, and those displaced animals end up somewhere. They likely feel the same way about us – dread the point where they develop opposable thumbs.

But what about bats? Ah, the poor little guys! Much of our population considers them ugly and creepy, not at all helped by folklore and horror stories, yet bats are actually way cool mammals, and good to keep the insects down. But most species nest in colonies, and this does sometimes mean in attics, which can produce lots of guano (bat poop) and increases the risks of rabies exposure, primarily when one gets lost and ends up within the human spaces of the house. However, the damage that they can do is minuscule, since they do not dig or gnaw, and excluding them only takes 1/4″ hardware cloth (small-holed wire mesh.) Again, this should be done when no young are being raised, and should always be done with gloves and a breath mask (guano turns into dust easily and can be inhaled.) Should you find a bat in your house, contact your local animal control, since states differ on how they handle potential exposures.

I said I’d get to this: So you want to learn how to rehabilitate wildlife? Once again, this is actually encouraged, but like riding a motorcycle, it should be done properly and responsibly. If there isn’t a wildlife center or organization available in your area, contact your regional Wildlife Resource Commission office (for the US at least) to find out who in your area can train you, and most especially what permissions you need. In the US you’ll need at least one permit, possibly several. What you’ll mostly need is training, because any species requires a decent body of knowledge to tackle well – which also means pick a species, at least to start. Your local rehabbers can suggest a few, which might mean picking something you didn’t initially desire, but which is either easier to learn or presents the greatest needs within an area (and again, is this about you, or the animals?) Expect to spend a lot of time at it, since most animals need lots of attention – mammals may need feedings every four hours around the clock, and birds every 15-30 minutes during daylight (yes, I knew a songbird rehabilitator that kept baby birds in the desk drawers of her office.) And it’s almost certainly all coming out of your own pocket.

SquirrelFeeding
I feel obligated to say this, too: wild animals are not pets, and should not be raised as such. There are lots of reasons. The domesticated animals we have as pets, like cats and dogs and horses, have been bred that way for thousands of years and quite likely were chosen because they already had traits that assisted the process. Animals do not domesticate by simply raising them around people, and in many cases have behaviors that cause them to run afoul of our own (I mention once again the squirrel scar I bear – that story was posted a few years ago.) Many animals also do not have diets that are easy for humans to replicate, meaning that they’re unlikely to thrive and may develop serious disabilities. But most distinctly, what we might imagine them to be like is rarely ever the case – they are highly unlikely to bond with humans in the slightest, and aren’t going to make good companions, do tricks, or even exhibit any appealing personality. They belong in the wild, and that should be your only goal.

Now, if the demands of rehabilitation are too much to contemplate, you can always volunteer with a local organization, and do rehabilitation on a rotation as your schedule permits. This helps prevent burnout and lets you have vacations and family emergencies. This also allows you to get involved without necessarily requiring the permits, because you can operate under the aegis of the organization and its own permits (which is how I worked with raptors, since my apartment would not fit the 15-meter flight cages required.) Still, expect to be dedicated to the job, even when it’s unsavory – cleaning cages and wounds, and even euthanizing injured animals, is a requisite part of it all. Not to mention how many species expect live or fresh food. If you’re thinking of cuddling fluffy bunnies, you’re not ready; rehab requires lots of ugly stuff, and very little bonding – they’re not pets, but wildlife, and need to be wild.

Or, simply donate money or materials. That works too, and is just as necessary – the nice thing about the subject is how nearly everyone can find a niche (provided they accept the reasonable expectations.) Despite such things as Wildlife Resource Commissions and the US Fish & Wildlife Service, there really isn’t money being put into wildlife rehab, especially not from a state or federal level. The vast majority of organizations run solely on donations and grants, and often even have to have veterinary services donated. Experienced workers are great, but donors are just as important, if not more so. Even people who can promote greater donations are important. Just about everything is grass-roots level, all of the time – the few exceptions are great, and demonstrations of what can be done, but not what you can expect throughout the field. Your help, whatever it is, will be appreciated.

A final note: find out, now, how to contact your local wildlife people. Before you find yourself with an injured owl on your hands. In some areas, it’s not self-evident or easy to find, and if it’s not a registered organization, you can forget about searching any telephone listings. Local animal control usually knows, and the 24-hour emergency vets. Often, 911 operators do not, and even local law enforcement may be stumped. A few minutes to get prepared can save a lot of hassle later on, and as I said, we’re entering baby season.

Hope this helps!

Tip Jar 9: Curves, part 2

And now we get into the second aspect of using the ‘Curves’ function for image editing, and that’s color management. I’m being my usual long-winded self here, so bear with me – if you can’t handle the length, there are TikTok morons that you could probably relate to.

Something that I didn’t go into within the video is, what constitutes excessive editing, or to be blunt, cheating? At what point does it become a digital creation rather than an edited photo? And there’s really no good answer to that – it’s more of a question you have to answer for yourself. I take a lot of pride in trying to capture something as close to perfect (or at least acceptable) in-camera, rather than attempting to ‘rescue’ it afterwards – and when I was shooting slide film, I had no choice, because whatever I did wrong was locked into the film. Yet I also see the value in creating something fartistic using the tools at hand – especially when it comes to monochrome images.

Then there’s the idea that the camera didn’t capture things perfectly or “as-is” to begin with – contrast and saturation settings within the camera, the metering mode and what it read from, and even the processing algorithms within the camera software all have their effects, so what’s “true”? Well, there is no such thing. BUT, being too heavy-handed in the tweaks or alterations that you do will be spotted by anyone with a modicum of experience, and it’s up to you to decide if you care or not (or up to them if they have stipulations over what is acceptable, with contest submissions for instance.) I personally avoid composites (using two or more images combined) for anything serious or fartistic, and only one of my prints has such a thing and that’s only for personal use. But I’ll have a lot of fun with them for frivolous purposes.

Getting these two videos done has laid the groundwork for some future Tip Jar posts, and I will try to link to them as needed, but knowing the basics of Curves will certainly help no matter what and is a useful skill to have, even if you do very little image editing.

Oh, just go

panel from "We need to talk about naked mole rats" by The Oatmeal, Matthew InmanThis isn’t one that lends itself to an easy description, or a slick way of introducing it, so I’m struggling here. But I’m on the mailing list for The Oatmeal, which is either a webcomic or the nom de plume of the guy who writes and illustrates them, maybe both. If you’re not familiar with the site, you should be, because it’s far worse than this one in terms of being indelicate and irreverent, plus the illustration style defies description.

Recently, the extended comic ‘We need to talk about naked mole rats’ was posted, and seriously, check it out. It’s worth it just for The Oatmeal illustrations of an already unsavory-looking creature, but the information therein is actually fascinating, and certainly a lot more than I ever knew about the species, which is unique in quite a few ways. It would be easy to look at naked mole rats and think they have nowhere to go but up, evolutionarily-speaking, but the actual traits that they’ve developed are extraordinary. We shouldn’t be judging on appearances – we’re bigger than that.

Plus, it’s almost certain at some time that The Oatmeal thought, You know, drawing the tiddies of the queen mole rat is probably unnecessary, only to be immediately countered with, The hell it is!

That would do it

I mentioned in the previous post about the possible explanation for the raised water levels in the pond, and The Girlfriend and I went out in the kayaks today to check things out. I would say the mystery is adequately solved.

large beaver dam at edge of The Bayou with better than a meter draft, taken from a kayak
That’s the edge of the kayak peeking in there, as it sat against the top of an impressive beaver dam, one that measured better than six meters in length across the drainage channel, and a meter or more difference in the water levels on either side. I could only get one decent perspective on it without trying to get out of the kayak and schlep around on shore someplace (which may come another day,) but I think these are expressive enough.

large beaver dam past bow of kayak, giving some indication of length
We only own half of the portion of the pond that we refer to as ‘The Bayou,’ and this sits beyond that dividing line, so technically it’s someone else’s property. It’s also not on the pond itself per se, but on an offshoot to the east, in the direction of the creek that forms the eastern border. It raised a few questions, especially given that we’ve been told the ponds are manmade, and the evidence for this was there – we also got down to the far end of the uniformly-shaped (more or less) pool and found the outlet pipe there. That was higher than this water level though. and this dam was beyond a break in the bank. It was responsible for flooding a very large section, seeming to extend all the way across to the creek itself.

flood plain caused by large beaver dam
So, what had caused the gap in the banks that allowed this to occur in the first place? Or, as I’m surmising right now, had the beavers dammed only a tributary of the creek, one seen beyond the dam in the photos, and the water level eventually surmounted a low point in the bank between this tributary and The Bayou, causing the ponds to become backed up too? That’s my working hypothesis right now.

flood plain caused by large beaver dam
From the shallow depth and the logs and cypress knees everywhere, I suspect the area seen in these two pics had been forest floor until recently, perhaps a bit boggy but otherwise solid – it now looks more like the creek flooded its banks, and we could potentially have paddled right on into the creek. Which would also explain the significant increase in trash in our ponds, since this became wide open water between the creek (receiving trash from the typical inbred redneck assholes that have to hurl their shit off the bridge where the road crosses the creek upstream) and the ponds. Which also means that my idea for putting a trash barrier along one channel would be next to worthless, because it wasn’t actually coming in that way.

The lodge was quite close by too.

large beaver lodge on edge of The Bayou, roughly a meter in height
While we have two beaver lodges on the property, one potentially abandoned, it would seem they weren’t the source of all the cutting and gnawing activity we’ve been seeing of late, since this is better than twice the size of either one, being a meter or more in outside height and showing fresh cuttings in its structure.

Which is another interesting point. Every lodge that I’ve ever seen in North Carolina has been dug into the steep banks of a stream, pond, or lake, rather than freestanding. The living area of the lodge itself is above water but underground, even when the entry is always submerged to prevent predator access, and the steep banks and land height above water level on the creek side permitted this; the minimal rise of the land on the pond sides wouldn’t allow for a dry chamber above water. This is the first tall dam I’ve seen where the living chamber might actually have been constructed under that log dome rather than dug out, perhaps even extended higher as the water level rose.

While we seemed to have two beavers living in one of those lodges near us, this confirms that there are certainly more within reach, and likely coming up to the backyard pond to snag more saplings as needed. Now, will I be able to get more pics or videos of these? That might be tricky, since there is no walking access to the dam or lodge that I know of, nor could see the potential of from the kayak, so that means I’d likely have to pack the photo equipment into a watertight case and haul it down to a nice vantage, beach, unload, and set up – and at least the return trip would be in full darkness. Not inconceivable, but a lot of effort, and not something I should be doing alone. Don’t count on it, is what I’m saying – unless someone wants to pony up some funding for the resulting pics and video? Let’s talk.

February responds defiantly

Perhaps having read my previous post where I dumped on February for being so dismal and rainy, it responded by producing a quite nice day today, as in, no jacket required, so take, take me home. The handful of leftover pics I had slotted to throw up here are now superseded by the ones I actually got today, and there’s just a few, so settle in.

We need to start with, the weeping willow (Salix babylonica) that I received last year is now kicking it for spring.

weeping willow Salix babylonica budding out in spring 2026
Unlike some of the other trees, the willow was very subtle about its early spring activity, producing only these very small buds tight against the branches like flattened thorns – until now, anyway. I don’t think the tree has quite topped four meters yet, but it’s close. And this is a wildly subjective thing anyway, since by nature it’s a floppy, droopy tree so the tallest branch may vary by half a meter or more depending on the wind and rain. I’ll try to get a size comparison soon, but right now, it’s slurping up all the rain in the boggy area we planted it within, specifically so it could – willows like wet ground.

Another tree was budding out enthusiastically too, but don’t ask me what.

unidentified tree budding out enthusiastically with red flowers
I probably should know what this is, since it’s right on the edge of the pond and has been photographed before, but I really don’t know. Maaayyybe swamp maple? Regardless, it’s pretty brilliant against the clear sky.

I played around a little with what the sunlight produced, while nearby.

reflections and shadows on pond surface with yellow cow lilies Nuphar lutea appearing from under surface
I noticed the yellow cow lilies (Nuphar lutea) were already springing back, visible under the surface but ready to overwhelm the pond again – that is, if the nutrias and the beavers let them, which is a big question right now, given how often those mammals are visiting. Of course, I had to back off a bit to get the bold reflections of the white trunks (another unidentified tree) in there. And then, the far more subtle part, the image is crossed horizontally with the shadows of other trees nearby, just making all sorts of interplay. That makes it fartistic, donchaknow.

The turtles had wasted no time taking advantage of the day, to be sure.

small eastern painted turtle Chrysemys picta picta basking on cypress knee with another painted and several yellow-bellied sliders Trachemys scripta scripta on Turtle Island in background
A small eastern painted turtle (Chrysemys picta picta) found one of the few dwindling basking spots in the higher water levels of the pond, while another painted and several yellow-bellied sliders (Trachemys scripta scripta) hog Turtle Island in the background. We really do need to make a few more basking spots, perhaps some kind of floating platforms (though maybe not – the winds may simply lodge those someplace shady and make them worthless.) I was shooting with the long lens to avoid spooking them, and snagged a closer frame of the little guy in the foreground.

small eastern painted turtle Chrysemys picta picta basking on bald cypress Taxodium distichum knee in backyard pond
Probably a little bigger than my hand-span in size, which makes it roughly half what the adults can achieve. I think the painteds are more wary than the sliders; the other day when The Girlfriend had the kayak out, she passed extremely close to a pair of sliders on Turtle Island who didn’t move until she was within three meters, which impressed me.

The turtles are definitely struggling with the higher water levels. I mean, they don’t care about the water per se, it just eradicates more of their basking areas.

four yellow-bellied sliders Trachemys scripta scriptaand one eastern painted turtle Chrysemys picta picta basking on the limited real estate of Turtle Island
Compare this image to this post (exactly a year ago!) when nineteen of them were all using that island. We really have to create something for them…

The Canada geese (Branta canadensis) were quite active today as well, congregating in pairs and, for the most part, just hanging out on holiday.

six Canada geese Branta canadensis congregating on backyard pond
They’re still not up to the level of trust that they had last year, curiously, and maintain a moderate distance when we’re around, but otherwise aren’t concerned. It’s a nice quiet spot for them and pretty protected, so they seem satisfied with it. They gave me a few nice framing opportunities too.

pair of yellow-bellied sliders Trachemys scripta scripta on Turtle Island with trio of Canade geese Branta canadensis in background
The turtles look wary here, as if ready to bail if the geese got too close, but then a little later on, I captured this image:

six Canada geese Branta canadensis and two yellow-bellied sliders Trachemys scripta scripta congregating on and around Turtle Island
The two turtles are still there to the left, if you look, and not at all concerned with being overrun. A little after this however, another pair of geese swam in from The Bayou and purposefully headed up here (the northern, opposite end of the backyard portion,) getting a little territorial with the ones seen here – nothing serious, but definitely herding them away a little. Those two then settled in on the other tussock with the broken snag (I think we’re calling it Goose Island now,) and so might have been the pair that looked like they were considering nesting there. Still monitoring this whole situation.

While we’ve seen some of the wood ducks close to the nest box, we’ve yet to witness anyone checking it out, but their nesting season is a little later on, I think. No, actually, we’re right on time (this post would go a hell of a lot faster if I didn’t keep searching for past posts that related.) But I took the opportunity to do a fartsy shot as one of the Canadas passed it by.

Canada goose Branta canadensis passing by wood duck nest box on backyard pond
I’d raised that nest box this winter, not getting it as high as I’d intended, but I also hadn’t realized until looking at the posts from last year that the water level is up higher than I’d thought – it appears to be a solid 25cm or more. We think we now know why, too, but that’ll wait until I can get some pics to feature.

Okay, two more. First thing I was after, stepping out today, was to see how that lone sunspot was progressing, just to compare.

two small spots on sun's face through solar filter, Feb 28, 2026
More visible now, with a companion, but not where I expected it to be – I need to check and see just how the sun’s axis is aligned in relation to Earth.

[This is slightly tricky. First off, the axis of both the sun and the moon, and Venus and Jupiter and all that, appear to realign as the day or night progresses, mostly because we’re seeing them from different angles as the Earth rotates – we just think “up” when looking at them in the sky, but that’s not the same as “towards celestial North” in any way. And then the viewing latitude makes a difference too, and our own planet has an axial tilt. So where the sun’s north pole sits in this image, I have no firm idea.]

And finally, a curious find that I want to check out better, but when I went out a couple of hours ago to try and find further examples, I came up empty-handed.

pair of unidentified snails entwined within  The Puddle, possibly showing through translucent shells
No more than a centimeter in length, these little unidentified snails were very visible just under the surface of The Puddle, catching the light quite well, but at full resolution here, some odd details are revealed. I initially though that what we’re seeing on the lower portions of the shells were mere reflections of the external parts of the snails as they – possibly mated? – but that doesn’t seem to align with what’s actually visible. So I suspect we’re seeing what’s inside the shells here, the anatomy of the snail that maintains contact when extruded, because the shells are that translucent. The two frames that I have are inconclusive, so I need to capture one or two to confirm this. Thus, there may be a followup to this, but not until next month (which is now just over an hour away.)

So that’s, what, twelve more images for February? That helps bring the numbers up for a relatively slow month in the winter, and I still have those leftover pics too. Plus, the busy season looms, so things should start picking up seriously very soon. And I need to jump on various spring projects too. Getting to be that time.

Hope you don’t want February, ’cause we’re out

Or at least, we will be in less than 24 hours. Indeed, this one almost snuck up on me, since I wasn’t aware of how fast the month was passing. I had the beginning of March pegged for removing some of the plants from the greenhouse, and that’s tomorrow. Sheesh.

We also know what that means, so let’s see what we’ve accomplished on the abstract front, shall we?

curious bar matrix of green, blue, and red
I shot this one for a specific purpose, which has not yet come to pass, so we’ll leave the explanation until then – in fact, it will become clear then, so I won’t even have to explain it. So if the mystery is digging at you, well, you’ll just have to cope.

But then, we have two shot specifically for the end of the month, like, within the past hour, because we needed a better showing than that. This was all experimental photography, meaning I shot 132 frames trying for a decent effect, and will probably keep less than a dozen. Glad I wasn’t trying this on slide film.

strange bubble or spherical textures, probably tiny
I admit, I shamelessly played with the colors on this one, because the original color register wasn’t quite to my liking. I could’ve slammed the contrast way higher too, but let it go – there’s such a thing as too abstract.

No, there probably isn’t at that.

And one more:

water drops with lots of background refraction
Now, this one is not too hard to figure out, if you’re beyond a certain age anyway. But given how many overcast and rainy days we’ve had this month (part of the reason why it’s been pretty damn light on photos and posts here,) we needed some overwhelming color and contrast. Yes, these are all macro images – maybe I’ll change it up in March and see what the most distant thing I can photograph is. I’ve just barely snagged M33, the Triangulum galaxy, and at 2.724 million light years distance, it’s even farther than Andromeda. Can I beat that? I’ll have to do some research and see what’s in my field of view for March.

There still might be a few images sneaking in before the day is out, just to clear some of the folder, but nothing earth-shaking. March should definitely see an uptick though.

Can confirm

On Monday, we had clear enough skies for me to go out and check on the condition of the sun, or more specifically, the sunspots thereon. I could not actually make any out in the viewfinder, nor on the monitor when I had unloaded the card.

sun face through solar filter showing no visible sunspots on Feb 23, 2026
I considered myself a victim of bad timing, since we’ve been having so much activity in this form for the past couple of years, and the reason for that is, we’re around the solar maximum, or the peak of sunspot and coronal activity that occurs every twelve years. Ah, well, so it goes.

And then I came across an article that confirms that the sun is free from spots, for the first time in over 1,300 days; the last period where none were observed was just shy of four years ago in June 2022. This is a little more in line with the solar cycles, since the minimum of coronal activity should have been around 2020 (well, for the sun, anyway – it was a little different on Earth.) So while I was thinking I caught nothing, I actually snagged something mildly notable, purely by chance. Go me.

The article also says that yesterday, a new spot was spotted, uh, located, whatever, so this period seems to have been quite brief, and for sure, the peak never drops off that quickly, so more a matter of happenstance than likely any indication of anything odd happening up there. But as the overcast lightened into heavy haze this afternoon, I went out and tried again, though my exposure was set higher this time – normally, I aim to underexpose by about 2/3 stop to keep the solar disk from starting to bleach out, but with the haze, I left it at normal. As the haze thinned, this meant it was overexposing slightly.

sun face through solar filter on Feb 25, 2026
I still wasn’t seeing any sunspots, and thought that perhaps the exposure was to blame, but then, there was a little smudge that showed in the same position through several frames, proving that it wasn’t a factor of the haze nor anything on my lens (since these were all handheld and thus the sun appears in a different location in the frame among all of them.) Let’s go to full-resolution for the detail:

full resolution inset of portion of sun's face from February 25, 2025, showing first hint of returning sunspot on edge of limb
Yep, there it is, just peeking over the top. Given that it’s not down towards the ‘side,’ it is likely to rotate a little more into view but still remain very close to the edge, since this is not terribly far from the sun’s pole. I’ll try to stay on top of it and see what happens.

Unfortunately, this meant that I blew the holiday off, since February 25th is Confirm Nothing Day. I confirmed nothing two days ago, but today, I confirmed something, which would be grounds for merciless teasing from my friends if they weren’t reluctant to admit that they witnessed this today. Though some might ask if I actually have any friends, which I will neither confirm nor deny.

Of course, if I simply delayed this post until Thursday instead, I meet the requirements of the holiday, at least in a left-handed manner, because while I confirmed that the new spot was indeed there on the 25th, I would not be publicly confirming that I had until the 26th. Though that’s kind of a half-ass solution…

Tip Jar 8: Curves, part 1

I’ve been meaning to get to this for a while, and finally tackled it this past week. Herewith, a tutorial on using the ‘Curves’ function in many image editing programs to adjust brightness and contrast within an image, selectively as needed.

As noted therein, this won’t work very well if your monitor is poorly calibrated for brightness, contrast, and gamma, so it’s recommended to tackle this first if needed before making any adjustments to your images. You can find a guide with useful images at https://w4zt.com/screen/.

One of the benefits of Curves is that it maintains a gradual change, with neighboring or flanking values within the image receiving some effect too, so no single area becomes drastically (and noticeably) different from another, a sure sign of manipulation and, too often, creating an unrealistic and bizarre appearance. It can still occur though, so keep an eye on all areas within the photo when doing editing, to spot those little patches that can sneak in and look out of place.

I said it several times in the video and now I’ll put it in writing: be subtle. When editing, it’s very easy to keep pushing things a little farther, since we seem to become insensitive to how far is ‘too far,’ so I recommend setting aside the edited version for a little while, looking at something else, and coming back to it fresh to see if it still looks acceptable. These suddenly renewed ‘first impressions’ can count for a lot, because anyone else may have that same first impression.

Also, you can use the various selection tools within your editing program to pick portions of the image to tweak in Curves while leaving the rest alone, which could have been done with the trees at sunset example – just be sure to Feather the edges of the selection to fuzz out and make the border of the selected area indistinct, otherwise if will often show very clearly.

Part 2 is coming next week (I think,) and involves using Curves for color corrections, as well as some creative editing. Meanwhile, this post documents one of the most specific adjustments that I’ve performed, as an extreme example. Yet to me at least, it still looks more realistic, and less doctored, than some of the fartistic approaches I’ve tried. Which is still fine, but those latter examples cross the personally-drawn line between a photo and a digital creation – you may have your own line, or none at all, but I still feel that accomplishing it “in-camera” is where the real skill lies.

Later weekly posts in the Tip Jar topic will expand on some of the things covered here, so I wanted to establish a baseline of knowledge first, for those who haven’t used such functions before.

Play around, and have fun with it!

That’s something to ponder

The other day (well, eight days ago) when The Girlfriend and I were out doing various property tasks, she came across three nearly identical finds that remain a small mystery, one I may be attempting to solve as I find the means to do so. To wit:

empty carapace of likely common musk turtle Sternotherus odoratus, recently scavenged
Right in one of the paths through the less-traveled sections of the property, she came up with this, the carapace of, most likely, a common musk turtle (Sternotherus odoratus.) While it was a warmer day, it had recently been quite cold, and so unlikely for the turtle to be out and about on its own for any reason, nor was it likely that this had been in the path since the time when it would have been out.

empty carapace of likely common musk turtle Sternotherus odoratus, recently scavenged
And another, smaller, but same species; we can tell by the faint ridge along the spine, and the small plastron:

empty carapace of likely common musk turtle Sternotherus odoratus, recently scavenged, showing small plastron
Any of the other species in the area that might have a carapace similar to what we’ve seen would also have a plastron (belly shell) larger than this. Noticeable upon close inspection, however, was that these were fairly fresh, and by that I mean, had been in possession of their living owner until relatively recently, since remnants of flesh were still within, not fully dried out nor scavenged by ants.

empty carapace of likely common musk turtle Sternotherus odoratus, recently scavenged, showing remnants of tissue within
In fact, a third that she’d found still had ants working on it, and so did not get photographed in my palm like these. Even I have my limits.

What’s curious to me is, what was digging up turtles hibernating for the winter, most likely in the mud at the edge of the pond, to eat them so recently? I was vaguely suspicious of the white ibis, since a few days earlier it had spent the entire day on the property, but this isn’t the kind of meal they tackle, nor is their beak made for this; they swallow prey whole for the most part, and certainly couldn’t section out a turtle. So I’m leaning towards raccoon, because we’ve seen them here and this might be something they’re adept at finding. Certainly not the nutrias or the beavers, which are both vegetarian. Also odd that the turtles seem to have been eaten in roughly the same time frame, all left out in the open in plain sight.

Most such activity, of course, would take place at night, and while I’ve been out quite often at night and caught glimpses of various critters, the opportunity to actively observe them hasn’t been there, given that a) they’re usually aware of me before I’m aware of them (though not always,) and b) I don’t have that night vision thing going on. There are options and I’m working on a couple, but the property is also quite large and so covering any decent portion of it is tricky. We actually did have a camera trained on the backyard and pond edge, which may be back in operation within a week or two, but it was so distant from the pond (wide-angle lens, of course,) that its motion sensor probably wouldn’t be triggered by anything smaller than a deer. Still working on it all.

The same day as the turtle shell finds, the late afternoon light was great and the wood ducks were congregating at the pond edge, so I slipped upstairs and managed to open the window without spooking them, and thus got a few nice portraits while their feathers were shining in the bright sunlight. Usually they avoid such conditions but, you know, corn…

two males and one female wood duck Aix sponsa foraging at pond edge in bright sunlight
These were at 600mm focal length but quite far removed from the ducks, so this is tightly cropped but not bad for that. The color palette is what I was after, and this shows the iridescence of the head feathers, the muted blue iridescence of the wings folded across the back, and a faint hint of the very fine stippling that adorns their sides (seen in better detail here.)

And then a couple of direct portraits.

male wood duck Aix sponsa in bright sunlight with own reflection in water
I like this one for the reflection, which is almost ideal, a chance timing thing when the rippling of the water was just right. I could do without the intervening branches (I say that a lot, don’t I?) and it would be nice if the water reflected greenery instead of the winter browns, but hey, I’ll still take it. and the next is better, I think.

male wood duck Aix sponsa head-on in bright sunlight
Better light and head angle, even if we don’t have as much of the colors. It’s funny: we’ve unintentionally conditioned the nutrias, and to a smaller extent the beavers, simply by putting down corn for food, but the wood ducks haven’t even begun to habituate since they always flee at the first sign of us in the backyard – they don’t even realize it’s us that distributes the corn since they’re well out of sight before this happens. So my attempts to get closer portraits (and a wider variety) is not progressing much at all. The ducks, in fact, inhibit a lot of work I might do in the backyard since I hate to spook them. Then again, I remember what I was considering a little over a year ago, and it didn’t realistically include the ducks being right freaking here, so I can cope, even while I keep trying.

Sorting finds n+15

Just two this time, even though the last sorting session was pretty hefty – I just featured most of what I liked at the time that I took them (well, in a reasonable time frame thereafter, anyway.) So we only have these:

looking straight up the beak of a roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja at Sylvan Heights Bird Park
One of several images taken of a roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja) while at Sylvan Heights Bird Park, I liked this perspective just for how it highlights the beak, and the fact that the bird could easily open paint cans if it so desired.

And this one, same place:

two adult and one juvenile scarlet ibis Eudocimus ruber preening identically at Sylvan Heights Bird Park
With this, I discover that I’ve never featured a scarlet ibis (Eudocimus ruber) before, even though I have images of them dating way back, like mid-nineties or thereabouts. I could have done without the background, but while three of them were preening identically while all perched in the top branches of a tree, I had to snap the image – the one at top is in juvenile coloration. Part of the reason I have not featured these before is that they’re not native to the US; though they might make the occasional appearance in south Florida, they’re native to the Caribbean and South America, so all of my pics have been captives in one place or another.

And I realized a short time back that, while I announced a potential solution to autofocus woes during video in two separate blog posts, I think, I never followed through. I’d switched to using the camcorder for the night work with the nutrias and beavers, refining that option until it was working quite well, but I also improved the use of the long lens for the daytime work with the ducks et al, and that was by obtaining a Canon 70D body instead, one that does allow autofocus while shooting video. That’s what these, and all of the video from the bird park, were shot with, and it works quite well.

Credit where it’s due, since this was a christmas present from The Girlfriend, even though I was the one that not only picked it out (at her insistence,) but sealed the winning bid – she gets too anxious with sniping on eBay. It arrived a couple weeks before christmas, and I got a short while to test it out and ensure that it was in working order, then it got packed away until the 25th because early presents are verboten. But in that time, I bought myself the battery grip, batteries, and large memory card.

A note about Canon’s naming/numbering conventions: Normally they’re a little backwards, in that the high-end bodies are single digits (like the 7D) while the more basic, lighter-option models are often in the hundreds. I was shooting with a 7D (still am, really) and then received this 70D which is clearly an upgraded, high-end model, and after getting used to this naming convention I keep getting mildly confused when unloading either body. It does not help that the memory cards themselves are named identically (“EOS DIGITAL,”) so I have to remind myself of what I’m doing constantly.

But yes, actually having autofocus while shooting video is a major boon, though why this wasn’t included in the earlier bodies I don’t know, since the HFS-100 camcorder that I’m using is way older and manages it just fine. Probably something to do with being a DSLR. Regardless, I’m able to shoot video without constantly keeping my hand on the focus ring, which likely contributed at least a little to the large number of video clips that I also had to sort through this time. The real culprit, however, was having so many subjects easily at hand. Gonna need to upgrade harddrives in the workhorse computer soon…

1 2 3 328