May I leave you with this?

I guess I’m not too tired of May puns

Anyway, it’s the last day of the month, and so time for the end-of-the-month abstracts, We cheat and go into archival images for this, actually waaayy back, into negative scans from the last century. Well, the scans might not necessarily be, but the negatives certainly were. I came across these both when I was trying to find some other original scans, decided they needed to be in the lineup, and now is a good time for them.

underwater shot of pool surface with foot reflection
So this was in 1993, unless it was 1992 or 1994. No editing, here, just an underwater shot with one of those disposable waterproof cameras while our group of friends were horsing around at the pool – this is shot facing the surface, the rippling water distorting the view above, while the stray reflection of my foot makes an appearance. Actually, thinking on this, I’m not 100% sure this is my foot. No, there weren’t stray feet floating around in the pool, but I’m vaguely suspicious this was actually taken by The Manatee instead, and thus is his foot. I’m looking at my foot right now, and it’s not this grey, but I don’t think this was good film either. A mystery for the ages, unless The Manatee comes in and sues me for unauthorized use of his photo. If you’re seeing nothing above, we have our answer.

I definitely took the next one though, and it’s much older than that.

dock on Skaneateles Lake in heavy fog with barest hint of tour boat out there
This was as I was coming into work in Skaneateles, New York, during a heavy fog, and just happened to have the old Wittnauer with me – this is almost certainly 1988. The negative is long gone, or at least I believe it is – several choice (for a given definition) negatives that I’d had prints made of disappeared, and I’m thinking I misplaced the protective sleeves someplace that they later got discarded. Still hoping they appear tucked into a binder or book someplace, but it’s been too many years now. Anyway, if you look hard into the mist, you’ll see a dark shape in there, which is actually a tour boat at the end of the dock. The further detail not visible at this resolution is the lettering of the signs, saying “No Trespassing – City of Syracuse,” which I guess was the governing body for the historical stone dock sitting right behind the wooden one. The same stone dock that was used for excursions by the City of Syracuse, an historic steamship that used to ply this lake and whose wreckage sits under water just off the end of this dock – I’d actually snorkeled down to the remaining timbers one time, but it was after this image was taken. Get it, though? The entire pic is a reference to the ghost of the ship. Fartsy on so many levels…

Estate Find 53a

Estate Find 53 was back in January, and this is simply a continuation of the story.

I had to go away for a while, ended up returning at roughly 1 AM this morning – spooked a handful of deer near the end of the driveway, but otherwise all seemed quiet. I got the first load of schtuff out of the car, had a quick bathroom break, and headed back out to get another load, flipping on the porch and walkway lights as I did so. Immediately outside of the front door, I heard a scuffle/thump right out of sight behind a camellia bush (so, not two meters away,) and took out my pocket flashlight to look around, suspecting a raccoon or something. Found a dark shape in the yard that I couldn’t place for a moment, and pieced together that it was one of the bird feeders when the eyes reflected back to me. Went right back in, grabbed the camera and the Vivitar 285 flash, adjusted settings quickly, and slowly went back out again. Focus was by the pocket flashlight held in my teeth, and couldn’t continue when my quarry looked away from me and I could no longer use the eye reflections, but I got a proof shot at least.

American black bear Ursus americanus scavenging birdseed out of downed bird feeder in yard
That, naturally, is an American black bear (Ursus americanus.) So, here’s the thing. After two raids and finding bear scat in the yard, we began taking the feeders in at night and set up a motion-detecting camera right by the feeders. And that was it; never saw any further signs, except for another pile of shit way down in the backyard that might have been there any length of time. No camera alerts, no signs of other foraging, nothing zip nada zilch. We figured our neighborhood bear had moved on to other, more promising yards. About two weeks ago, the camera came detached and we simply took it back inside.

But we left the bird feeders out overnight while we were away, for two nights, and this is what we get. A quick look at the aftermath:

multiple bent-over crooks and a damaged bird feeder from bear marauding
We have here the main bird feeding station, all crooks bent over a bit, one feeder emptied while somehow not removing it from the cook, another feeder opened on the ground (green thing to lower right.) As I watched from inside this very window, the bear returned and rooted around in this area, ensuring that it had emptied both feeders but hoping for more (I guess since I was home now.) But this meant the bear and I were separated by less than two meters, albeit with a wall and window in between.

The other one was more impressive.

bent over crook with formerly attached bird feeder in background
That’s the other crook that held a feeder, in fact the one seen in the first pic, visible as an out-of-focus splash of yellow in the background. Obviously the bear had been at this for a while, spooked momentarily by the arrival of the car, and again but less so by my re-emergence from the house. I measured it: we were 11 meters apart at that encounter, and I have to say, it was an experience to be standing there that close to a wild bear. Not terrifying, since I know black bears tend to be more timid and spooky than their brown cousins, but I was definitely still on high alert. The bear, meanwhile, appeared less concerned (even though I probably outweighed it by at least 30 kilos.) Size-wise, it was about the same as a large Newfoundland or Great Pyrenees, perhaps a meter high at the shoulder and somewhere in the rough neighborhood of 70 kilos? I mean, I didn’t try to pick it up…

Curiously, that crook remained embedded firmly enough in the ground that it got quite malformed by the bear’s administrations to remove the feeder:

significantly bear-bent ground anchor of crook for bird feeders
Getting this back into reasonable shape was a little tricky, mostly in finding a way to anchor it to reverse those bends. None of the bird feeders was irreparable, either, in fact only one was notably damaged, having its loop for hanging pulled out; another had a bent bird perch. Even the suet cage was somehow intact, emptied despite being clipped closed. Either the bear had an extremely adept tongue, or it had inadvertently snapped the cage closed again after cleaning it out.

The bird feeders are all restored and refilled now, but yes, they will be coming in at nights, and the camera will be back in place shortly. At least the bear was complacent enough to allow me to obtain direct proof. The property keeps on providing subjects…

Psscchhfff, “topic”

Who needs one, am I right? No need to get all hoity-toity with this – it’s a blog.

Which means I’m cleaning out a handful of images that have been piling up in the blog folder, unable to be attached to any theme.

spring peeper Pseudacris crucifer ready to leap from bamboo
Out one night and tracking a nearby ratcheting sound, I happened across this guy and got some nice poses, largely to try and invoke an identification since I’d never heard any of the chorus frogs make sounds like that before. There was a good reason for this: I was hearing the katydid not too far away, and not this one, which is only a spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer.) But the pose is nice, waiting for the security guards to pass before it slips in and steals the Blementibloop Emerald from under their noses.

At this time of year, working late in Deep 13 (my basement office, AKA Walkabout Studios,) I often hear small thumps from the windows, which is always (so far anyway) some variation of this guy:

southern toad Anaxyrus terrestris standing on hind legs at window to Walkabout Studios/Deep 13
Attracted by the insects that are attracted by the light, several different species of amphibians, in this case a southern toad (Anaxyrus terrestris,) will thump against the glass in their pursuits, or just take the opportunity to turn the tables and spy on me. Naturally, I couldn’t let one standing on its hind legs pass. But don’t be giving me any flack about that window; it’s an old house with appropriately-aged sashes, and these sit right smack at ground level under the roof peak end that doesn’t have gutters. They’ve been cleaned – it gets right back this way with the next rain. They’ll be replaced with modern vinyl units eventually. Just shut up.

In fact, here:

juvenile green treefrog Dryophytes cinereus peeking over paver with hind toe raised.
I caught this juvenile green treefrog (Dryophytes cinereus) peeking over top of a paver, and it flipped me the toe, and so I pass this on to you.

Out at night with the headlamp, I often get reflections coming back to me because of the minimal separation between the light source and my eyes, which tells me where to look closer. The flash unit on the camera has a greater separation though, so I can rarely reproduce the effect – I would have liked to have for these at least.

wolf spider Lycosidae in leaf litter, sans reflections from light
What I saw was one bright reflection, with numerous tiny little sparkly reflections above it, making me think I’d found Tinkerbell. No, I knew right away what it was, and thus got closer to this wolf spider for a slightly better view.

closeup of adult female wolf spider Lycosidae with new brood on its abdomen
The bright reflection came from mama’s eyes, while all the little sparklies came from the eyes of the young on her back – I really do need to figure out how to capture this quickly, because it’s a cool effect. Provided, of course, you can deal with spiders. This one was about average for a wolf spider, legs spanning roughly the size of a quarter.

Then there was this (same night, actually):

eye reflections from a pair of North American raccoons Procyon lotor and the water beneath
I usually see some variation of this, but not quite like this one. Let’s go in closer:

closer view of eye reflections from pair of North American raccoons Procyon lotor and the water beneath
Far enough away that the flash reproduced the reflections faithfully, but just close enough to get some of the surrounding detail, we can see now that it’s a pair of North American raccoons (Procyon lotor) and the secondary reflections from the water’s surface. I had a better initial view, since I was seeing over top of that intervening branch, but the camera sits just a few centimeters lower, enough to block portions of the reflections. I realized this and was moving forward to correct it, but as typical from the species, the raccoons did not maintain eye contact but were quickly moving off. We have cats that visit the property from time to time, and it becomes fairly easy to tell them apart just from the reflections, or behavior thereof. Cats will continue to stare in your direction, trying to determine what’s happening, but raccoons don’t wait around; they’ll look into the light for just a few moments, they turn away and start to move off. Occasionally, you’ll get a new appearance some distance away as they check to see if you’re advancing, often from up a tree trunk a little ways, but again, never for more than a second or two.

Old one here:

juvenile Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis peering out from behind stem of Japanese maple
This one dated from back in March, and I think I’d already had too many Carolina anoles (Anolis carolinensis) posted then, so it sat here. Obviously not too early in the year, since the Japanese maples were leafing out well. Curiously, the anoles seemed to have abandoned the Japanese maples entirely, not running around on them by day, not sleeping on them by night. Not sure why. They’re still quite active on the deck, though. Quite active.

pair of adult Carolina anoles Anolis carolinensis mating on hammock on back deck
Language is fun. While the italics might have carried the emphasis and meaning pretty decently, it’s not hard to say that two-word sentence out loud, in a certain way, and immediately make someone think it’s dirty. Very similar to the way that line from Raiders of the Lost Ark was delivered:Top. Men.” And now I’ve introduced an entirely different meaning in your head and it will never leave – unless it was already there before.

Anyway, I was out on the deck doing copy photos for prints I had neither the negatives nor the digital files for, and these two were cavorting openly. Or canoodling. Cabaling? I best leave it here…

Some flowers to clean our mental palate (unless you think like that about flowers.) Two from earlier spring in April, two recent.

two blossoms of hairy-stem spiderwort Tradescantia hirsuticaulis
We had/have a good crop of hairy-stem spiderwort (Tradescantia hirsuticaulis) in the back yard, the one that we don’t mow, and we’re kind of glad we don’t because critters have now been coming into the yard to partake of these – you’ll see more video clips eventually. I was just playing around with the depth and color here.

Meanwhile, the azaleas were also in bloom, so I did a quick composition in contrast:

juvenile green treefrog Dryophytes cinereus failing to blend in with pink azaleas
Even with the help of the white stripe, this treefrog wasn’t camouflaging against the blooms very well. It obviously wasn’t too hot of a day, or it would have been tucked in someplace darker and cooler.

Nearby, but just a few days ago now:

black knight butterfly bush Buddleja davidii flower spike showing atypical bud pattern
Funny, only a couple of days after this, the flowers were bursting forth in brilliant purple, but I don’t feel like going out there just to reshoot this. But butterfly bush (Buddleja davidii) flowers grow in distinctive conical spikes on the end of their branches, all clustered together, except this year this particular plant has some of them throwing out separate clusters further down the stem – mostly on the center stalks, too. Not sure what this means, but I can’t think ‘disease,’ since this bush is the biggest and thickest since we got it years ago.

And finally,

closeup of blossoms of blue salvia or sage showing raindrops
Last year we got three different salvia plants, in three colors: blue, red, and purple. The red somehow didn’t make it through the winter, but the purple and blue are both growing enthusiastically, the purple just now throwing out buds. The blue has been blooming heartily though, and I took a moment after a rain to do a few shots of it, mostly for the record, but a tight crop n one portion with the raindrops worked well – getting fartsy again. The brighter leaves in the background set off the stamens well too.

Well, that’s thirteen pics out of the folders, so I’ve done my job and cleaned things up a tiny bit – there are still plenty more in there, some quite old and probably need to be deleted. Still made a post of it though.

Send nutes

I’ve stalled on this video compilation for too long, especially since I have another waiting in the wings that now has far too many clips to add to it, but here it is, anyway: more of what goes on at the pond edge, mostly at night, but there are a couple day clips in there.

Now, I’m well aware that a video this length will cause a certain percentage of people to simply skip it, unable to maintain interest that long or choose to ‘spare’ so many minutes from their busy social media schedule to watch the whole thing – as you can tell, I’m not terribly in favor of such attitudes. I have toyed with the idea of making single clips with brief explanations, that I upload more frequently, but I remain undecided on this approach, for multiple reasons.

The first is, it will likely mean that I have a running backlog of clips, something hard to keep track of as I sit down to edit these (“Wait – I haven’t actually shown the behavior that I just referenced, have I?”) The second is, it’s easier to feature new activities or behavior immediately following the previous, for contrast and explanation and simply drama. The third is, as mentioned before, that nature photography/videography is about patience; some nights you’re waiting for something interesting to happen, tracking your subjects around as they display much the same behavior that you’re seen (and featured) many times before; some nights there’s very little activity; some nights there’s none. These clips have been edited down to the interesting bits – just not the ultra-sparse, 1.8 seconds of immediate action that gets featured elsewhere.

Then there’s the editing. For sure, I’m more likely to edit a shorter collection of clips, or a single one, faster and not stall on them as I do. It also makes the voiceover easier – at least, to a degree. Very often, what I have to show and what (I think) should be explained are two entirely different lengths. You’ll already find portions where I change what I’m saying as something happens, courtesy of putting together the clips and then playing them back in edited form to record the voiceover. There are several ways around this (perhaps more if I actually researched doing proper editing,) and I’m considering the merits of these.

Meanwhile, I’m also tossing around potential or active improvements to both video and audio, which will remain an ongoing thing I expect. Every change comes with its own challenges or issues, to the point that some are simply not worth making, but I have to find that out first ;-)

So, what will happen in the future? Not sure just yet. But you’ll definitely see it here (if you’re actually asking the question, care about the answer, or even exist – you know, that definition of “You.”)

Estate Find 62

The first part of this began seven days ago, when I was out poking around at night, as is my wont, and spotted this one tucked in among the trees in a wooded portion of the property:

young male white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus fawn sleeping in thin foliage at night
Okay, I didn’t spot it, it was already spotted when I found it. But in case it isn’t obvious, this is a white-tailed deer fawn (Odocoileus virginianus.) The funny thing about this is, it was about a meter from where I’d found one last year, three days away from that anniversary. Is it safe to suppose this is a fawn from the same doe as last year? Or is this simply an ideal spot?

You can see the little nubbins of antlers there too, confirming this one is a male. Unlike last year, I wasn’t bearing the camera and had to go back and get it. I got this one clear frame, then as I was adjusting the aperture, the fawn burst from its location and bounded off into the foliage, surprising me a little. Typically, they get put down in one spot by the mother, and know to wait there until she returns – this is often not long after birth. This one, however, seemed confident enough to dart away, making me feel a little bad, but I knew it wouldn’t go far and mom would be back soon enough, so I left the area quietly.

That wasn’t enough for a post, however, and I had this image lined up with a few other odds and ends to come up this week. Meanwhile, we’ve been seeing a doe coming by to scarf corn semi-regularly, and we’ve watched for a fawn to be accompanying it, but no dice. So this morning when I saw it down there, I checked and found no fawn, and watched her wander away. Normally I would have let her slip from sight around the house, but she was heading towards the end where the garden was, and it’s rained hard enough the past couple of days that the deer repellent has probably washed away, so I wanted to make sure she wasn’t going to stop and snack on our plants.

She paused, right near the tomato cages, and flicked her ears around as if unsure of what to do next. And then the fawn came bounding out of the thicket (a dozen meters or so from where I’d seen it,) coming up to its mother and savagely butting her in the abdomen before beginning to nurse.

white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus doe nursing fawn while encouraging it to defecate
Now, here’s the deal. I was watching from the guest room window, no camera in hand – that was up in the upstairs bathroom attached to the tripod, aimed at the pond edge where, like, everything goes on. So I had to run up and get this, then slip quietly out the front door and around the edge of the house and camellias, hoping not to spook the pair. I was successful in this, but the tomato cages were directly between us, spoiling the view, so I instead went through the house and out onto the back deck, slipping into view carefully. I was in a yellow shirt and outlined against the sky from their vantage, with the shutter of the camera plainly audible. And she really didn’t pay attention to me.

The doe is actually massaging the fawn to get it to urinate/defecate while nursing, since they’ll tend to hold it at this age – you can see housecats do the same thing with their young kittens.

male white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus fawn venturing a few steps from its mother
The doe got a little restless after a few moments, taking a few steps forward, and the fawn took that opportunity to wander around just a wee bit. But mom hadn’t gone far and settled back down, so it returned to nursing.

white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus doe staring straight at photographer while nursing fawn
I’ve been after shots like this for a while now, having just missed an opportunity four years ago. I even tried a little video, but handheld with the long lens, it’s shaky as hell – no time to get a tripod or even a monopod. Mostly, I was counting on the still frames. and while mom is staring right at me here, even as the camera clattered away, she soon enough turned away to scout for other possible threats, perhaps because I was holding still enough, and Junior resumed nursing.

white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus doe not staring straight at photographer while nursing fawn
In fact, this was how I left them – having gotten enough frames, I slowly backed out of view, even as she watched. The Girlfriend was observing from the same guest room window, able to tell when the doe caught sight of me from her behavior, and also that she wasn’t too concerned about it. We’re wondering how long it’ll be before the fawn is weaned and we see them both out foraging together – we’ll certainly be watching. But for now, that’s another one off the list.

Tip Jar 22: Not to worry

In going back through some of the things that I advise new photographers on, I realized there were a few things that I suggested not to be concerned abut, a whole list actually. So herewith, some of the things that you can put out of your head.

Equipment. A big one here, because it’s one of the most common misconceptions. While there is no doubt that better equipment can assist you in your pursuits, the key word there is ‘assist’; it will not make the images for you, and will not vastly improve what you’re doing now. It’s very easy to believe that something you’re struggling with will magically go away with a new camera, lens, or doodad – I’ve done this countless times myself – but the bare truth is, it might give you an edge, it might makes things slightly easier for you in certain circumstances, but that’s all. Far too many people buy the latest and greatest, thinking they’ll get professional results by doing so, and find out after dropping all that money that this just isn’t so. Meanwhile, if you have the desire to accomplish something, you’ll often find a way to make it work.

I think the biggest exception to this is, sharp lenses. There’s really no workaround for them. However, this does not always translate to spending a lot of money, and there are some hidden gems out there that perform quite well without requiring huge expense. Bear in mind that the difference between that top-of-the-line example and the ‘consumer’ example, in terms of quality, is perhaps ten percent, probably less. In terms of cost, however, it’s rarely less than a 50% increase, usually many times that.

That said, composition is what makes the images worthwhile, and all that takes is a little effort.

Criticism. Not everyone likes the same thing, and you can’t please everybody. Never take a bad critique as anything more than a single data point, one out of seven billion possible, and realize that people have bad days, people have specific biases, and people can simply be jackasses. The same, meanwhile, can hold true for positive reviews, especially from people that we know and that don’t want to ‘hurt our feelings’ or whatever. A broad consensus can indicate more, but these are actually very hard to accomplish – we usually only have the opportunity to hear a few opinions.

The best critiques are the detailed ones that review how different elements work, and how they struck the viewer – sometimes we hear something that never occurred to us or that we didn’t notice ourselves. Still only a single data point, but with reasons and thought behind them, a little more valuable.

Developing a style. This will develop all on its own, no active input from us. There tends to be too much emphasis on being unique, known for only one approach or technique, and it’s exceptionally rare that we can make this work, while very easy to fall into poor productivity, or poor products, in trying. Your interests, perhaps influenced by the works of those that you like, will guide you towards your own style; do what you like, and your niche will be determined by that.

It’s not even necessary to have a niche. It depends on what you intend to get from your photography, which may only be, “I like doing this so here we are.” Not everything has to be income-producing, a misleading aspect of our culture anymore. But even if that’s the way we go, income usually comes from doing what others want, and that often isn’t something unique or specialized. In such cases, being limited to only one style may limit our prospects.

Compositional rules. There are no such thing – they’re rough guidelines, nothing more, and too often based on averages, which isn’t what we want our images to be. It’s good to understand elements, and how one aspect might work better in a given situation than another. It’s good to understand lighting and contrast and spacing, to the point that these are automatic when you’re framing a shot. But there’s no magic formula, and no perfect shot. Most especially, we can bog ourselves down in over-analyzing the frame to the point that a) we never feel that it’s acceptable, and/or b) that we take far too long or miss some crucial timing. When we’re unsure, we can always take a few just to try them out, and remember that cropping is an option as well.

All these functions and options and switches. While some of them may be useful to our pursuits, once we understand them, some (perhaps most) of them may have no application whatsoever to us. Bear in mind that, all photographers up to roughly fifty years ago had just four options total: shutter speed, aperture, focus, and ISO, this last being much more limited than now and not switchable without changing film. Every image that you find, that old or older, was done without special functions – many without even a light meter. Feel free to look up in the manual what any function/setting/button does, and if it seems to be gobbledegook, ignore it.

But, it’s not a bad idea to revisit these from time to time, to discover that now, with your greater knowledge or difference in approach, you have a use for one or two.

Know, too, that the claims of manufacturers for the functionality or value of such options is very often exaggerated. Even trying them out (focus modes are a good example) may not tell you much, since their functionality too often depends on conditions and may require a lot of testing to determine where their edge lies.

Not enough of what I take is good. You should know that, even among working professionals, the ‘keeper’ rates are not terribly high, usually varying between 33 and 50% – that means they throw out more than half of their images right off the bat. And curiously, these numbers won’t actually change as we go along, since as our abilities improve, our standards get higher. It’s next to impossible to take good pictures every time, so we shouldn’t even consider this as a goal, much less a measuring stick. Look at the bad pics to determine what went wrong, and then move on – it’s these little embarrassments that serve as the best learning experiences anyway.

At the same time, we can also be too harsh on ourselves. We may be looking at the images of some highly-published photographer as our goal, but everyone else is comparing them to their own pics, or their friends’, often taken with a phone camera. Don’t get me wrong; it’s always good to be improving, and you’ll look back on what you took a few years ago and shudder, but don’t put too much weight on still getting bad pics. It’s part of the process, and if it was easy, everyone would be doing it and there would be no challenge nor interest.

Listen, I hate missing a shot that I believe I should have gotten, especially when it’s 90% likely that I’ll never have that opportunity again. But then, I have images that I never dreamed I’d get, of subjects that I never had on my radar in the first place. It’s important not to be too narrow in our focus.

Advice. We can get all Schrodinger and wonder how we can take my advice on not worrying about advice if we like, but this is more like, “Use your own judgment.” No one’s advice can possibly apply to everyone, and photography is an extremely broad genre. Sometimes what we hear from someone is specific to their experiences, or even exactly the opposite of what they did and struggled with, which doesn’t automatically make the converse better. We have to follow our own paths, and examine advice with a critical eye. Sometimes it’s very good, and something that we never realized. Sometimes it’s not at all what we should be doing. And this applies no matter what level of professional or successful person we meet – there is no ‘right’ way to tackle most of photography.

What should we be worried about? Nothing, really – photography isn’t worth stress. But I can list a few things that we should put effort into, the ones that help improve things.

Sharp focus. We should always take the time to ensure that the point that we really want sharp, is.

Exposure. It’s too easy to get something that’s off a little too much, so we should pay attention to conditions and contrast, and make adjustments or bracket exposures as needed.

Basic settings. Are we in the mode that we want to be in? Are there any settings still remaining from the last session, that we really don’t want for this one? A once-over on the settings as soon as we take the camera from the bag is always a good idea.

Composition. Not by ‘the rules,’ but by our own eye. Create a story, show the scene, give enough context, or position ourselves to show off the subject best. Those, by themselves, will often override many compositional guidelines.

Timing. We should always be ready for that moment in time when things are ‘right,’ when we get that expression or behavior or conditions from the surroundings – whatever.

Remain safe. For us, and our equipment. Don’t bet that something won’t happen this time because it hasn’t before – losing that bet can be costly, way out of proportion to the inconvenience of doing things carefully. Our equipment is expensive, and so are we. Keep them all intact.

Trust instinct. We know what we like to see from images, so we can create much the same, almost automatically. Don’t overthink anything – let it flow instead.

Have fun. Enough said.

Now and then

yellow-bellied slider Trachemys scripta scripta perched high on knees of bald cypress Taxodium distichum overlooking feeding nutria Myocastor coypus in water
Well, it’s now “Then and then,” since I didn’t quite get things done while it was still World Turtle Day, but I got to recognize the holiday a little, anyway. The photos are all from WTD, which was yesterday now, though the video from a week ago. I did a patrol of the Estates while it wasn’t raining, but found nothing to do any closeups of. Above, we see a ubiquitous yellow-bellied slider (Trachemys scripta scripta) perched high up on a cypress knee, appearing to face down a nutria (Myocastor coypus,) though in reality neither probably even noticed the other; the turtle was catching the brief sunlight and the nutria feeding, a task that has a very short list of things which are allowed to interrupt.

A little further down the ‘beach,’ we had this:

collection of turtles sunning themselves on World Turtle Day
The pond edge that sees the most activity lies almost due east from the house, but by afternoon is shaded by all the trees in the yard, so lighting is rarely optimal there. When I snagged this shot, I initially thought I only had three turtles, looking like elderly women trying to determine who just broke wind, but upon unloading I found two more hanging out subtly on the sides:

yellow-bellied slider Trachemys scripta scripta and possibly eastern painted turtle Chrysemys picta picta sunning themselves on pond edge
The one on the right is definitely a slider, but the one on the left may be an eastern painted turtle (Chrysemys picta picta.) The shell appears smooth and there looks like a hint of red on the skin around the tail. Regardless, still certainly a turtle.

Last weekend, even though I was working in the yard, I found this one a little too late to see the start of things, but we have the wrap-up anyway.

While I’d like to have the complete sequence, start to finish, I’m also not sure that any turtle would begin her nest when I was in sight – my only chance for such a thing might be from a great distance with the long lens. Once committed like this, of course, they have no choice but to see it through, and even then, you can see that my view was limited.

As I said in the narration, there was another nest immediately alongside, laid not two days earlier, and these were in the same location as last year’s slider nest – there’s something about this spot. Additionally, they’ll cut through this area and alongside the driveway if they wish to go farther, and it seems like they do fairly frequently – we’ve found them several hundred meters away. To my mind, this would expose the young to unnecessary dangers upon hatching, given how far they’d have to go to reach the safety of water, but the turtles seem to know what they’re doing, so perhaps they’re selecting nest spots that have the best conditions for gestation. Then again, we have yet to see one that has actually hatched out, so perhaps not.

And one to close, showing what Turtle Island looks like with the help of the beavers raising the water levels. Yes, this is the same little tussock as seen here.

yellow-bellied slider Trachemys scripta scripta basking on Turtle Island

Appropriately slow

closeup of likely eastern mud turtle Kinosternon subrubrum mostly hidden within shell
For reasons unknown, Thunderbird (my e-mail/calendar program) has stopped providing the programmed reminders at the proper times, meaning I will either get notifications randomly, or not at all. So we have little forewarning about World Turtle Day, which is tomorrow. I already have a few things I can feature, and will see if I have the opportunity for anything further – we’ve been having warnings of lots of rain for the past week, but so far it has pushed off better than 24 hours from when it was supposed to begin, and we’re starting to get suspicious that we’ll receive a lot less than expected.

But it’s also laying season and the evidence of that has been significant, so we’ll see, won’t we? Either way, don’t wait for me to provide for you, but go out and find your own turtles. Or donate to a turtle rescue group somewhere – the sea turtle rehabilitation centers can always use a little more help. Do something for turtles, since it’s their day – you know they’d do the same for you.

Life on these Estates

Mostly trivia here, with a closing bit of amusement, but at least I’m posting some more. Now, if we could only get it to be something good

Despite the up-and-down nature of the temperatures, actually requiring us to move a few things back into the greenhouse, many of the plants around Walkabout Estates are kicking it this spring. The largest butterfly bush (Buddleja davidii,) the Black Knight variety, has been especially happy with the new location after transplanting it from the old place. I thought it was doing decently there, but it showed me how much it could grow in the right conditions, having now just surpassed me in height and no slouch in width, either.

black knight butterfly bush Buddleja davidii with author behind for scale, image by The Girlfriend
We didn’t actually know it had calla lily neighbors when we planted it, I’m not sure why not, since we planted it in October I believe and the lilies should have been well in evidence. Last year they were competing over the same space and we ended up trimming the butterfly bush back a bit from that side, which is hardly noticeable. If you look near the new blossoms on the left, you can see the lilies sprouting up behind, and they’ll get quite tall themselves.

One of those flower spikes you see there, by the way, has a small mutation.

newly blossoming butterfly bush Buddleja davidii flower spike forked at end
I’ll revisit it when it’s in full bloom, but while the bush will flower all summer long, the individual spikes like this don’t last that long and will die off within a couple weeks.

I remarked last year that the almond tree, started spontaneously from the compost pile two residences back (making it 14 years old now,) had finally surpassed me in height – that would be 182 cm. This spring, however, it laughed at such feeble comparisons.

almond tree on Walkabout Estates growing exuberantly; image by The Girlfriend
For years, we watched it to see if it would thrive, wondering if it would even take in this climate, and so we never shaped it as a tree, much less a producing one, which is why it looks more like a bush. Having discovered that its growth is stunted if it gets clipped by foraging deer in the spring, we began treating it before it even buds out with deer repellent, and this has made quite a bit if difference – the deer nibbled a small handful of leaves and realized it tasted like shit and let it be. Meanwhile, the soil here seems to make it a lot happier.

The authoer peering through the thick foliage of the almond tree; image by The GirlfriendAnd you did see me peeking out of the tree in there, right? I hope so – I’d hate for all my advice about observation and patterns to have gone to waste.

We did a better sense of scale while we were at it.

author unable to reach top leaves of almond tree; image by The Girlfriend
We realized, sometime late last year, that we did not do enough initial photos on moving in, to show what it was like before and how big certain plants were, but I went back through Google Maps images and confirmed that the almond tree was perhaps a little over a meter tall at the old place, just shy of two years ago. So yes, it’s doubled its height in about 19 months, to say nothing of the volume.

Another comparison:

author's hand against knot of maximum growth of almond tree, as of last winter
If you look closely right around my ring finger, you’ll see the knot on the brown trunk that marked the peak of the tree last year, turning to green above that to signify this year’s growth. I measured this: so far, it’s extended 60 cm above that.

Still, however, it hasn’t really produced almonds. Oh, it’s tried, and several times we had the fruits developing, but they’ve never actually matured fully, most of them disappearing before this occurs. This year it blossomed exuberantly, but I suspect the multiple cold snaps that we had since then stunted any further development of those, since I can’t find any on the tree at all. While it’s not like we’re hoping for a bountiful almond harvest, it would be nice to see it develop into a reproducing tree.

The other thing that’s been happening right now is the turtle onslaught. Abruptly, the yellow-bellied sliders (Trachemys scripta scripta) have entered laying season, and they go a pretty decent distance away from the pond to do this. Three days ago The Girlfriend and I watched one female closing off her nest after laying, almost exactly where one had done so last year, and the day after I found another in the laying process, not 30 cm away from that one. Notably, this is on the highest part of the property, better than 80 meters from the water no matter how you measure it. Then yesterday we saw one on the driveway, we think heading out to a nest site someplace. A little over an hour later as I was collecting damnable pine cones from the side yard, I encountered one again, this time heading back down towards the water. She hesitated of course, then made a slight detour to avoid me and made tracks down to the pond. Still later, as we were getting the pics above, yet another was found in roughly that same area (and direction of travel,) and this time we stopped to get pics.

yellow-bellied slider Trachemys scripta scripta likely returning from laying eggs
About typical size for adult sliders, this one had a carapace that was roughly 25 cm long and 20 wide, give or take. She’d been out long enough for the duckweed that she swam through on her way out to have dried out on her back. We wondered if this or the previous one had been the one we saw heading out, but this one had a very distinct identifying characteristic that ruled her out.

yellow-bellied slider Trachemys scripta scripta with large portion of hind carapace missing from injury long past
That’s a hell of a missing chunk there, well-healed over so likely it occurred long ago. She’s lucky she didn’t lose a hind leg, but it was intact and quite functional. I felt the edges of this old wound just to see how the healing had gone, to which she took grave exception, which is where it gets amusing. I sat down in front of her with the smutphone to record her movement, if she would deign to do so for me, and nudged her in that portion of the shell.

Failing to follow my own advice about making sure one has a safe escape from any species, I sat down cross-legged, which put me at a distinct disadvantage when she blasted past the phone and dove headfirst into the region of my crotch. I used to be able to stand up without hands from a cross-legged position, but that was some time (and weight) ago. The Girlfriend’s scolding tone, as if I was ignoring the turtle, was amusing; meanwhile, the turtle was having none of this shit and had actually seized the strap of my sandal in her mouth. I dropped the phone to deal with this, regretfully since I would have liked to have gotten a pic or video of her savaging my sandal, but she soon relinquished it and I turned her towards the pond. Definitely far more aggressive than I expected, but it made for an amusing clip at least.

So, yeah, that’s what we’ve been up to. I’ll be sure to let you know if and when we see any of the nests hatch out – last year I had three marked and yet there was no evidence of hatching, not sure why. Hopefully we’ll fare better with these.

Rapid turnaround

I actually have some other things that I was about to post, but while down distributing critter corn I noticed the moon was looking pleasant, and quickly got set up before it disappeared behind the house. So it’s bumping the other things temporarily.

7.4% crescent moon with a hint of clouds
Ehhhh, not bad, and at 7.4% illuminated, hardly the smallest crescent that I’ve captured, but we can do better.

7.4% crescent moon with earthshine and hint of clouds
This is a tad brighter than the earthshine was actually appearing, but that’s okay – I didn’t have a lot of time to play around. And really, I’m not complaining about the detail – you can see Tycho’s impact rays, for dog’s sake! And the fact that some thin, wispy clouds were adding their own touches.

That wasn’t all, though. You might have heard this, but Venus is appearing quite close by tonight too.

7.4% crescent moon with earthshine, clouds, and Venus nearby
Venus is very bright right now, in gibbous phase though you really can’t tell that without a moderate telescope – I think I’ve captured a hint of it before, but not much.

Venus goes through phases just like the moon, but since it’s on its own orbit around the sun, these have different impacts. When full or close to it like now, Venus is on the far side of the sun from us and about as small as it can appear. It gets much larger as it gets between us and the sun, but then it’s down to crescent phases and often not even visible at night, though if you know where to look you might see it during the day. Otherwise, you’re trying to catch it at twilight when the sun isn’t visible. One of these days I’ll snag a detailed crescent, but it will likely take planning and still won’t be that big in the frame, considering how small it appears when it’s as close as it can get.

1 2 3 334