Sorting captures (1?)

So, we’re all already familiar with the sorting finds, the images that I come across when sorting all of the recent photos into the appropriate folders that I then realize I should feature in a post; you may wonder why I didn’t do this initially upon unloading the memory cards, but I either found something else that had a higher priority, or was too busy at the time, or simply hadn’t looked closely enough at certain images to recognize the merit that they had. But whatever, stop sidetracking me.

In this case, we’re featuring a couple of images captured while doing the sorting, a first I believe. Last night I was deep into the overdue task and happened to glance down to find the office/studio/lair chair was in imminent danger of rolling over my next subject. This is not, in and of itself, a rarity – having a basement office with an outside door in an older house means critters, mostly arthropods but occasionally not, are frequent visitors. This one, however, seemed slightly misshapen, and upon capturing it I confirmed why.

female wolf spider Lycosidae with collection of newborns on abdomen
Yep, a wolf spider mama taking the young out for their first real adventure, trying to get rolled or stepped on. She was easy to capture and get into the pan I use for such ‘studio’ shots, but far less cooperative in staying away from the edges so it looked more natural – she was even more averse to the leaves I provided that would have made an even better setting. I am lucky in that the ridge on the side of the planter tray that I used, combined with the color of the table thereon showing through the translucent plastic, actually appears more like brickwork than anything else. Plus short depth-of-field, of course. Let’s get creepier.

cluster of newborn wolf spiderlings Lycosidae on mother's abdomen
She was moving a little sluggishly for the species, perhaps because of the young, but it meant I could focus better on her and the bebbehs, and she only shifted immediately after I achieved sharp focus about five times, which is ahead of the game for such sessions. None of the young-uns showed the slightest inclination to even twitch a leg.

These were with the 180mm macro, but I switched to the reversed 28-105 to try and get closer, without the best results.

cluster of newborn wolf spiderlings Lycosidae with two showing eyes
The dark patches in there are the ‘faces’ of two of the newborns – you can see that they typically use their legs to hide their identities, which makes me realize: eight eyes, eight legs, so they can still play peekaboo. Evolution is amazing. Focus could have been better of course, but part of the problem was, achieving truly close focus means having the lens very close to the subject, and the edges of the planter tray were actually interfering. Also, the range of sharpest focus is within a millimeter, and since I was shooting handheld (albeit propped on the table where I could,) this mean sharp focus was more a matter of timing my trivial swaying in and out of that range, with more misses than hits. But why weren’t you using a tripod and a macro slider? you ask, a trifle impertinently, but I’ll patiently explain that such things are nigh worthless with living subjects, since they require said subjects to remain cooperatively in one place while all this is set up – good luck with that. Generally, you have between two and ten seconds to pin down sharp focus before your subject buggers off to a different position, and you will then spend that same timeframe trying to get everything lined up again, even with a tray like this that you can slide around. This was not my first spider rodeo…

While I was doing this, I decided to tackle a subject that had been waiting for a couple of days, so I deposited mama and the fry back outside and turned to this one. The other night, as I approached a golden silk orbweaver (Trichonephila clavipes) in her web, I was observing some odd movements and, even as I suspected I knew what was happening, I saw her free her recently molted exoskeleton from the web and drop it – timing was just a little off on that one. However, I collected the exoskeleton and brought it in for a macro session, but then didn’t tackle it for a few days. This seemed to be a good time.

front view of molted exoskeleton of golden silk orbweaver Trichonephila clavipes
This was one of the initial shots with the 180mm macro, a little blown out but it got light down to the eyes and chelicerae like I was after. However, I needed to be closer and more detailed, so it was back to the reversed 28-105.

extreme closeup of front view of golden silk orbweaver Trichonephila clavipes molted exoskeleton, showing eye arrangement and chelicerae
This took several tries to get right, because I was trying to get both the eyes and the chelicerae in the same plane of focus – imagine trying this with a living subject that prefers to hang vertically. But you can easily see the eye arrangement, with the four outer eyes facing sideways on little eyebumps. I should have been creative and gotten some light source down under and behind the cephalothorax to shine up through the eyes – maybe next time. But since I also got those fangs in focus, I’m good with this. So you know, the space between the topmost eyes and the bottom of the chelicerae measures a whopping 5.4 mm – try getting that precise measurement with a living subject. I also must note that this is only about half of full adult size for the species, female anyway. We don’t seem to have quite as many on the property as we did last year, but how many do you really need? Okay then.

All right, back to sorting.

Confirmation needed

Went out to the car in the evening, just as it was getting fully dark, and on my return, right alongside the front door, I heard a sharp rustle in the leaves underneath the camellia flanking the door. I took out my pocket flashlight and tried tracking the noisemaker, going around the bush carefully since this was too reminiscent of an earlier encounter. Finally spotted a toad, figured that was the culprit (and this is very typical – several toads frequent the front area,) until I saw the thick dark body of a snake alongside the house. The snake realized it was busted and broke for cover exceedingly quickly, so I only got a glimpse of the head, but the size and darkness of the body and what markings I’d seen struck me more of a cottonmouth than anything else.

Now, the property here is ideal for the species, which is quite venomous, but I had yet to spot one at all – plenty of other species, including three different (harmless) types of water snakes, but not a cottonmouth. I was determined to try and prove this, because I’ve never even seen one in the wild, but some caution was needed of course, especially given that I was barefoot. In short order, I determined that it had gone to ground in the gap between the bricks that supported the rain barrel, so I put on some boots as a modicum of protection and gathered up the camera. Which, naturally, wanted to fog up immediately since it remains that kind of weather. Thus, my initial pics weren’t conclusive – or actually, they were, but not until closely examined.

water snake, likely northern water snake Nerodia sipedon, hiding out in hollow between bricks
The head is turned away, though the on-camera flash illuminated it well enough – the macro flash rig I had attached just wouldn’t get into the narrow angle needed to shine into the hollow. In a short while, however, the snake had turned its head to see what I was doing better, and this time I used the (urk) smutphone, because the illuminating LED sits right alongside the lens. Since all I have on my cheapass little phone is a wider-angle lens, this meant I had to get damn close to the opening, far too close for safety, but by this point I had seen enough.

water snake, likely northern water snake Nerodia sipedon, showing head clearly in hollow between bricks
Smoother, less-angular head, distinct vertical stripes on upper and lower jaws, and round pupils instead of slitted – all traits that eliminate cottonmouth as an ID. Instead, this is another species of water snake, most likely a northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon,) though the details I’d need to see to confirm that – whether the bands near the tail are solid or broken – are hidden. No way to show scale for these, but the body was quite thick, and I got the impression it had either eaten recently or was perhaps pregnant. This is also quite dark for the species, with minimal distinctions in the markings – not out of line for the wide variations that occur, but more in line with the coloration of cottonmouths; it looked almost solid black at first, and a detail that registered in passing but only subconsciously, it looked very matte and dull, due to the rough scales. This immediately distinguished it from the other two black species in the area (eastern racer and eastern rat snake,) which both look slimmer and smoother/shinier. I also don’t think I’ve seen the black variant of the rat snake in this region – they’ve all been the grey variant.

Anyway, a false alarm, which is both good and bad. Bad in that I still haven’t actually seen a cottonmouth, much less photographed one, but also good in that a snake that was right alongside the front door was not actually venomous. It also reminded me that I get complacent at times, and need to remain alert for such potential hazards.

Tip Jar: Hiatus

Nothing for the Tip Jar right at the moment – my time, motivation, and desire simply didn’t coincide this week to permit me to have something up here right now. While I have tried quite seriously to adhere to a schedule from the moment I started doing regular posts, this isn’t a job, isn’t producing income, and shows no evidence of people really counting on seeing the new stuff popping up anyway ;-). For my own discipline, I maintain it, because it’s good to have challenges and obligations, but sometimes, it’s simply going to slide a bit. Maybe I’m skipping a week, maybe it’s just slipping for a day or two, but nothing worse than that.

In the meantime, have a slide scan from back in 2001 I believe, the only time I’ve gotten images of a newborn killdeer (Charadrius vociferus.) This is another that’s been on my list, but it’s been decades since I’ve found a killdeer nest, despite how easy it is – they’re ground nesters, usually little more than a clearing among rocks and gravel, and the adult will handily inform you that you’re getting close by calling loudly from a short distance away while dragging a wing as if injured, luring you hungrily in pursuit so you don’t find the camouflage-speckled eggs in plain sight. And because of this odd placement of nests, the newborns are up and running around within an hour or so of hatching, totally unlike most other bird species. It’s very cute.

slide scan of mother and newborn killdeer Charadrius vociferus at driveway's edge
Anyway, it’s a follow-up to this post, the most recent capture of a killdeer. But no bebbehs…

Cursing and learning: A photo essay

I sat down this morning, literally, and tackled (not literally) a project that has been on my list for years, that even just laying the groundwork for has taken far too long, and I don’t consider it ‘completed’ yet, nor may I ever. But I certainly didn’t come close to it today, though I made progress and got some successes.

I’m referring to doing some natural photos of hummingbirds, specifically the ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) that are the only species I’ve seen in person. “Natural’ means, “not at a feeder or other contrivance,” and of course, to accomplish this, you need flowers that hummingbirds like to feed upon. We’ve had butterfly bushes for years, but these don’t seem to attract much if any attention. We’ve planted (several times) cardinal flowers, which never germinated at all. And we’ve had some potted salvia, which started off nicely but then faded. Finally, late last summer we got two varieties of salvia, a blue and a purple, which settled in nicely and then exploded with activity this spring. This has finally worked as intended, and the hummers have been visiting them routinely – I just haven’t set up the camera nearby to photograph the activity, until now.

[To satisfy my habit of providing proper names, I will say that both salvias appear to be varieties of Salvia guaranitica – the blue was still tagged as such, while the purple appears closest to this hybrid, also a variety. That’s what I’m going with, anyway.]

adult male ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris feeding semi-obscured on purple salvia Salvia guaranitica blossomsIt was relatively early in the day when the sun was still on the other side of the house as well as partially-clouded, so the light was low, and my first attempts didn’t have a fast enough shutter speed to halt their movements well enough. This male, the ‘owner’ of the purple plant, was quite hyperactive and difficult enough to track even with autofocus, typically visiting a blossom for literally a fraction of a second, enough time for a tiny sip, before moving to another.

A note about hummers. They’re neurotic, or what we would consider to be so from their actions, though we can’t vouch for their actual mental state; they are fiercely territorial over their chosen feeding spots, often staking them out to keep watch and chase off any intruders the moment they’re spotted, which leads to frequent chases and occasional aerial battles, and they easily appear to spend far more time trying to fend off intruders than actually feeding – it’s hard to believe they get enough calories to function. The purple salvia was guarded by a male, while the blue was owned by a female, while at least two others made frequent attempts with varying success. There are also three feeders that we maintain, one within meters of the purple plant, so there’s more than enough food to go around, but it’s just not in their nature to share.

autofocus completely missing the subject and locking onto the background
The salvia plants themselves are thick and deep, but the background is also cluttered, in this case with a camellia bush, so between this and trying to keep up with a twitchy subject, autofocus frequently just buggered off to the background or occasionally nothing at all. I tried switching it off and going manual, but that wasn’t any better, far too slow with the movements of the hummingbirds. I also tried staking out particular blossoms, locking focus thereon and waiting, but this didn’t work either, and I could tell that I was missing activity just outside of the field of view. The best process seemed to be, autofocus, watch the activity over top of the camera, and then attempt to snag it when the hummer was in an ideal position. Note that, “best,” doesn’t mean, “good,” and the hummers would often move on to another location in the moments while I was raising and aiming the camera.

adult female ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris dodging focus on blue salvia Salvia guaranitica blossom
Or simply move off even as I had focus locked and framed nicely. But there’s something nicely ominous about how her eyes rendered here.

This is the female that ‘owns’ the blue salvia, and I will note that I tweaked the blue registers here to hew closer to the actual color of the blossoms, since the camera isn’t actually capable of capturing it.

adult female ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris feeding from foreground blue salvia Salvia guaranitica blossom while background blossom was in focus
Another miss, but the background blossom was sharp, so let’s claim that was the intention. Just so you know, the linear separation of these two blooms might have been as high as 20 cm, but likely less – depth of field at this magnification just isn’t there. When I try again, I may sit back further to see if I can improve on this a little, at least to have autofocus not have to twitch as much.

adult female ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris perched on stem of blue salvia Salvia guaranitica showing red spot on throat
The female, at least, was cooperative several times over, in that she’d perch right on or near her claimed plant to guard it, as well as keep an eye on what I was doing. But it meant I could actually get some sharp photos, including of her bare patch of red feathers on the throat, in proper light too. The male almost never managed a light angle to show off the red iridescence, and his throat virtually always appeared dull brown.

Also, I’d boosted ISO to 800 here, and changed to my preset for low-contrast conditions, which boosts contrast and saturation a bit – visibly different here.

sharp profile of perched adult female ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris
Nice profile. Can’t complain.

adult female ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris showing flared neck feathers
A curious effect here. You can see she’s stretched her neck longer, but the neck feathers looked splayed backwards – this is possibly a territorial display directed at an interloper, since she vanished from the frame immediately after this. I know I’ve seen them spread their tail feathers for the same reason, usually when facing off in flight.

By the way, sitting in a lawn chair with a view of both plants, I was treated to the frequent chittering that they make when chasing one another off, as well as being buzzed several times – when in pursuit, they don’t pay a lot of attention to trivial concerns like nature photographers. It was this very chittering that redirected my attention to particular birds, since my attention was being routinely split between the two bushes.

adult female ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris feeding from rose
The blue salvia sits in front of a massive spread of roses that was here when we moved in, but this was the first I’d seen a hummingbird actually drinking from one.

adult female ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris perched still flapping on rose
And a pause, since it sat the highest in the immediate vicinity and afforded a good view to protect her territory, though most often she sat lower and more camouflaged against the greenery.

adult male ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris feeding from purple salvia Salvia guaranitica. partially obscured by own wings
This is the clearest shot I managed of the male that owned the purple salvia, unfortunately partially obscured by its own wing. The shutter speed was only 1/160 second, nowhere near fast enough to freeze the wings. I’ve had them blurred at 1/800 second – the wingbeat of hummingbirds is astounding.

But yes, the goal is to not only get sharp photos of the male, who’s more hyperactive than the female, but also to get that red iridescence of the throat, which will take better light. I didn’t get a chance to get back out this afternoon when the sun had crossed the house, though I will eventually – the heat during the day is still horrendous, and dangerous even when just sitting on one’s ass, so you’d best appreciate it when it happens.

adult male ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris sneaking in quick meal on purple salvia Salvia guaranitica claimed as territory by another male
Now, another male was sneaking in to partake of the purple, and had learned that the ‘owner’ took a particular perch in an oak tree nearby, so this guy would slip in on the blind side of the bush, practically underneath, and get a few drinks in down there before being discovered. The average time this lasted seemed to be in the range of 2-8 seconds – hummers have good eyes.

focus not quite on adult male ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris feeding from purple salvia Salvia guaranitica
One last one of the possessive male – this would have been a better shot with focus on properly, and much better with the iridescence. But at least the plants are convenient and the hummers are visiting them routinely, so the opportunity is there to do better. I have about a month or so before they split and head south for the winter. Hopefully, more will follow soon.

F for “F-ort”

night sky exposure of Milky Way and Cassiopeia showing no meteors
So I did go out last night and early this morning in the pursuit of Perseids, starting off just in the backyard but then deciding to go down to a small boat launch area not too far away, which I’ve used once before. The scattered thin clouds visible during the day (see previous post) had all vanished, and things were pretty clear, as you might be able to tell from this stretch of the Milky Way seen looking northeast. Cassiopeia can be picked out in the milky band, a little below mid-frame, which means that the radiant of the Perseids shower was a little below that. Look in the band closer to the top of the frame, though, and you’ll see two brighter stars flanking a darker patch, what I call the ‘gateway stars’ since both the stars and the gap in the Milky Way are visible on a clear night. These are Deneb and Sadr, and sat at roughly a 75° altitude, so this frame largely captures half of the sky vertically – this is the Tamron 10-24mm super-wide, which has its pros and cons.

night exposure of branch of inlet near boat dock showing lights of nearby cities
The benefit, of course, is that it can capture the most sky area, or indeed any other kind of landscape, of any lens I own, without introducing too much distortion – when viewed as a whole frame. The horizon glow you see here comes from not only the town we live within, but also likely the next city beyond too, both lying in about the same line from here.

inset of previous frame showing anastigmatic distortion of stars at edges of frame during night exposure.
An inset from the previous frame near the edge, this shows one of the two major drawbacks of the lens: the attempt to correct the wide-angle distortion inherent in shooting at such a wide angle still produces strange artifacts, not the best for trying to do starfields, certainly. The other major drawback is that it still distorts, meaning straight lines near the edges of the frame still lean, sometimes at odd angles. While it can increase the chance of capturing a meteor in any given frame because it covers more sky, it also reduces the size of said meteor, and of course, other elements in the frame may look warped. I’ll probably stick with the 18-135 at 18mm from now on.

But, how was the meteor activity, you ask? Actually, there were more visible than most ‘shower’ nights I’ve been out, including two bright and distinct trail meteors, though no real fireballs that I saw – naturally, the two bright ones occurred outside of the camera’s field of view, one of which cutting right across that inlet view above, just, not while I was aimed there. But how about where I was aiming?

full-frame night exposure showing Milky Way and apparent Perseids meteor
This is full-frame, and I was delighted to see that streak to lower left when unloading, since I didn’t recall one being visible in that location, and given the display here, it should have been bright. We’ll go in closer on that same frame.

parallel tracks of two moving bright objects during long night exposure, not likely meteors
A double, one with a very distinct change in brightness! Not terribly long, but a valid capture at least. Right?

Looking at the next frame, wrong.

continued tracks during long night exposure, revealing parallel satellites
Meteors are far too brief to continue into the next frame, especially with a few seconds in between – these are satellites. The curious thing about them is, this was at about 1:15 AM, looking almost due north, so this should have been the least likely time and place to see satellites since they need to catch the sun to be visible. Polar orbit, certainly, and I’m guessing higher. These both were about 60-second exposures. I checked Stellarium but this showed no satellites at all in the vicinity, though I probably need to update my database. Given the parallel tracks so close together in timing, I’m going to take a stab and say these may have been Starlink satellites, the only ones I know running so close together in this manner. Figures.

I witnessed a few that certainly fell within the field of view of the camera while I was exposing, including two that crossed directly over Cassiopeia in opposite directions within two seconds of each other, but all of these were momentary ‘shooting stars’ and none appear to have registered at my settings – I was even firing off frames of just a couple of seconds immediately after seeing a visible meteor, just to mark the preceding frame as one to examine closely, but no sign of anything, certainly not anything to show off.

Most of my exposures were done at ISO 1600, but as the meteor activity seemed to be increasing and I wanted to try and capture these brief streaks better, I switched to ISO 3200, and this was the biggest mistake. I shortened the exposure times down to about 30 seconds, thinking I’d have the same exposure but better chance of catching the brief dim streaks, but the resulting images were far worse.

night exposure of same patches of sky showing failure of ISO 3200
This is almost the same exact field-of-view as the first image above – if you look closely, you can just make out Cassiopeia in the center of the frame, and those gateway stars towards the upper left, having rotated counter-clockwise a little as the night wore on. But this is so bad I thought I’d inadvertently changed other settings, or perhaps even bumped focus. However, everything is in line, and I even have a distinct dotted line from an aircraft passing through, so this is just the camera not handling ISO 3200 worth a shit.

This was a thing with film, and it even had a term: reciprocity failure. ‘Reciprocity’ is the thing where camera settings are all based on f-stops or exposure values (same thing): you can increase shutter speed by a stop, but open the aperture by a stop, and produce the same exposure. With film, the idea was, you could increase ISO by a stop, and then reduce by a stop in aperture or shutter speed, allowing higher depth-of-field or a faster shutter speed. However, the response of the emulsion compounds during long exposures meant that the sensitivity would drop off over time (a few seconds to a few minutes,) so you could no longer dependably calculate this trade-off, hence ‘reciprocity failure.’ Not having this was one of the benefits of digital, but I suspect (off the top of my head) that ISO 3200 on the Canon 7D is an ‘expanded’ ISO setting, where the software is supposed to compensate, much like what I might do in GIMP to try and coax a better light response, but the sensor really didn’t capture enough of the light necessary to enhance. Regardless, 1600 is now considered the upper limit as far as I’m concerned.

[This is true of many cameras, and I always cautioned my students that the upper two or three settings in ISO should be ignored, since they rarely produced any useful results, the images typically looking like they came from a much shittier camera.]

Now, the other thing from the session, which at present I have nothing to show for. While out there on a marvelously quiet night, the barest of breezes but an excellent temperature, both great horned owls and eastern screech owls were calling routinely – I’d never heard the calls of screech owls and had to check it with my BirdNet app, but they sound fantastic. I tried for some recordings just on my smutphone, but it couldn’t handle the minimal volume, and I’ll have to return with more dedicated recording equipment. Seeing either, of course, much less photographing them, is going to be a lot harder, but I’m game at least. Another goal, of which I have no lack.

Just a taste

My friend texted me this morning asking me when the solar eclipse was, and I was about to answer, “It’s not,” since the path of totality passed across northern Europe. But then I thought to check and see if there was any portion visible from the US, and indeed there was. The irony of this being, I could see the smallest fragment from where I was, but not from where he was, just two hours south. Still, this prompted me to go out at the right time.

I didn’t have specific details for where I was, but in the nearest big city, the eclipse was supposed to peak at 0.33% – yes, one-third of one percent. Here, it might have reached 0.35. I suppose I could have checked Stellarium, and indeed, still can – according to that, it peaked at 0.40% for this location – righteous! This is what it looked like through the solar filter, roughly 13 minutes before that time:

minimal partial solar eclipse roughly 13 minutes before peak, through solar filter
When using the filter, I always set to under-expose by a certain amount, since the exposure meter on the camera copes with the darkness surrounding the disk and tends to render the sun too bright – in this case, it’s one full stop ‘underexposed.’ You can also see a hint of two sunspots in there, though focus was slightly off.

[I was aiming too close to vertical for this, since it was about 2 PM locally, and so using the swingout LCD on the Canon 70D as a viewfinder, since I couldn’t raise the tripod with the long lens that high above my head and my neck doesn’t otherwise bend that way – for stability, I set the tripod fairly low and sat on the ground to do this. Sharp focus, however, is achieved by firing off test frames and then examining them at high magnification, which works fine at night but less so in the glaring sunlight, so the above frame was off a tad.]

This is the stunning amount that it reached just past peak:

peak minimal partial solar eclipse from North Carolina, August 12 2026, through a solar filter
According to Stellarium, this really is at 0.35% here, this time 1 1/3 stops underexposed. This was the sharpest of the frames, but you’ll notice the greater glow around it; thin clouds were passing in front of the sun. I did, in fact, do video, which just barely shows the movement – ah, what the hell.

This partial lasted just 30 minutes, and in between frames I had my shirt draped over the camera and lens to keep it from getting too hot, since it’s still brutal out there. During the frames, the shirt was draped over me and the viewfinder so I could see, and not broil too badly.

One last frame as the eclipse was ending.

tiny fragment of partial solar eclipse remaining, through solar filter
I left this at full resolution, but again, thin clouds were affecting things so it could have been sharper; this time, I knew the focus was as good as it was going to get.

I think we have largely the same conditions tonight as the Perseids are peaking, so we’ll see if I snag anything. Meanwhile, a partial lunar eclipse will be taking place in just two weeks – funny how that works. Should I get the counterparts to these, we’ll have a nice matched set for August- perfect decor for the baby’s bedroom! I’m taking advance orders…

Leetle ones

A small (heh!) collection of diminutive critters from the environs, the past several days.

Checking out the diamond spire gardenias one night as they had started blooming again, I saw a little knot around one leaf cluster, almost but not quite appearing as fallen leaves.

brown snake Storeria dekayi wrapped around cluster of leaves on diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive' PPIP at night
Yes, this is a reasonable illustration of scale – gardenia leaves and flowers aren’t that big, the leaves usually 25-35mm across. I was just a little surprised to find this guy sleeping off of the ground like this, rather than tucked into a burrow or cluster of dead leaves as I would have thought.

brown snake Storeria dekayi wrapped around cluster of leaves on diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive' PPIP at night
Trying to get a decent view was challenging, since other ‘trunks’ of the gardenia were in the way and I was trying not to disturb the plant too much to avoid spooking my subject off. The size, the spots along the sides, and the rough, keeled scales identify this as a brown snake (Storeria dekayi.)

brown snake Storeria dekayi peeking out from cluster of leaves on diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive' PPIP at night
I finally got down to have a view of the head, shooting in between the ‘trunks.’ Smaller than a pencil in diameter, this is about average size for the species, maybe a wee bit smaller. Overall length perhaps around 200mm, but that’s just guessing.

On the same plant, over a week later, we had a different guest spending the night.

head of newborn Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis peeking out from under leaves of diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive' PPIP
This was undoubtedly a newborn Carolina anole (Anolis carolinensis,) except I’ve never seen one emerge from an egg yet and don’t know if they immediately start running around on plants or spend some period of time hiding within leaf litter; it was the smallest I think I’ve seen, anyway, and I endeavored to illustrate this.

newborn Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis on leaves of diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive&#03 with millimeter scale slipped in
It started getting a little bit antsy as I was sliding the millimeter scale into the frame, and there was only so close I could get it, but I think this effectively illustrates that the head is 4mm wide or less.

When it shifted position, I also shifted the scale, slightly more illustrative.

newborn Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis on leaves of diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive&#03 with millimeter scale alongside
The scale is propped between leaves, underneath the anole but closer to us, so it actually appears slightly larger than it would had it been lined up alongside. While doing all this, I managed to peg an overall length of 50mm, but with anoles, half of that (or better) is tail alone, this one tapering down to a tiny thread. It could easily have stretched along my middle finger, and been completely hidden when I turned my hand over.

newborn Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis looking anxious on leaves of diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive&#03
Despite the closed eyes in the previous pic, the anole was still antsy – they do this a lot, and I don’t understand it, but even when alerted to potential danger, in only moments they’ll close their eyes and appear to drop into a catnap; I’m beginning to wonder if this isn’t a camouflage reflex, hiding the dark contrast of their eyes from predators. You’d think they would evolve eye color more in line with their bodies, if that were the case…

Anyway, this one was still slinking carefully around on the leaves, unsure if it should flee – this is all by night and illuminated by the headlamp (or the camera flash during the pics,) so it probably couldn’t see that well, though the millimeter scale certainly slid into the same light and was likely in view. We’ll go in closer on this frame for the detail – anoles have great scales.

inset closeup of newborn Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis looking anxious on leaves of diamond spire gardenia Gardenia hybrid 'Leefive&#03
Length (not width) of the head here, perhaps 7mm – that’s the width of a pencil. I would have liked to have coaxed it onto my hand for better scale, but it was clear the anole wouldn’t have taken well to this and I probably would have achieved nothing, especially since the camera with the 180mm and flash/softbox is heavy, not easily handled in one hand. I need an assistant more often. Though I did have one for the next.

juvenile green treefrog Dryophytes cinereus perched on fence slat at night
Not newborn, per se, but newly emerged from the water and its tadpole stage, this green treefrog (Dryophytes cinereus) was also quite small. I later went out and measured the fence slat that it’s on, which is 20mm in width. This time, though, The Girlfriend was handy, and she didn’t mind holding the frog for a different scale shot, even though she was worried that it’d leap away. The frog was more cooperative than anticipated, though.

diminutive juvenile green treefrog Dryophytes cinereus in palm of The Girlfriend, for scale
There’s always a certain level of amusement to such sessions, since she’s always urging me to hurry up, “It’s going to jump away!”, like I’m not already aware of this. What, they jump? This one, however, settled in nicely and actually had to be coaxed back out of her hand. Would that all my subjects be this willing…

[Look, I know that’s acceptable sentence structure, and has been used countless times before in great literary works and all that, but it really doesn’t make sense by any rules of English, does it? This may be the last I’ll ever use such a thing.]

Polyunsaturated

monchromatic sunset on Pamlico River waterfront
Went down to the waterfront the other evening around sunset, the first time in a while because we’re usually getting dinner about that time, and there was a hint of promise with scattered clouds of different types, which are good when you’re looking for colors. Instead, the sun dipped below a distant cloudbank and only the barest hint of color was produced – so it goes. A little later on, some of the higher clouds got a momentary dappling of yellow, and that was it. Better luck next time.

Still, there’s just enough color to keep it from being completely monochrome, and some decent contrast, not just in brightness, but in textures as well. I’ll keep it.

Tip Jar 32: Layer masks

Been meaning to get to this one for a while, just never set aside the time to do it. Finally started this past week with a few days to spare, which was good, because I ended up having to re-record it after finding the screen capture software wasn’t capturing, like, the screen, instead cropping off the sides a little. So let’s take a look at using layer masks, because they’re brilliant, and this is something that you would have a hard time accomplishing in an old style, wet darkroom with an enlarger – definitely one of the benefits of digital.

By the way, not throwing any shade at Adam Zubek-Nizol’s image used therein, because it’s excellent, and I’m in no way implying that it needs improvement. Instead, it was an image showing the traits you might want to reduce for a commissioned portrait – I have a couple of examples of my own, back from the wedding stringer days, but not the subjects’ permission to use them and I respect privacy herein, thus the royalty-free image.

You can also see that the deep black of the shadows from the wrinkles and creases actually rendered the skin tones a little more grey when the Gaussian Blur filter was applied, which should then have been color-corrected or the deep black de-selected before the Blur was applied – again, this was a quick-and-dirty demo, but editing for serious results should take such extra efforts into consideration.

Still fighting the background noise issue, even though the effect is notably trivial – I can hear it, so I want it gone. This comes from Walkabout Studios being too close to the AC units, and the ridiculous heat causing them to kick on even if I try to time recording between such. It’s getting to be an elaborate set of audio edits to try and remove these, and I did them in the wrong order, and wasn’t going to record everything a third time. Had I waited until the minimal cooling that nightfall brings to stretch out the periods between AC cycles, I would instead be dealing with frog noises. Some better windows are on the list of things to tackle for Deep 13 here – not because of recording, but because they really do need to be replaced – and we’ll see how much they may correct the issues.

As I said, play around with the technique, because it’s remarkably useful – I was shown this decades ago and have made good use of it ever since.

You may also find these posts on digital editing useful:

Tip Jar 8: Curves, part 1

Tip Jar 9: Curves, part 2

Tip Jar 12: Greyscale

Tip Jar 24: Dodging and burning

Tip Jar 25: Using the Clone or Rubber Stamp tool

Tip Jar 26: Perspective tool

Just because, part 58

mist drops collected on hind foot of Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis at night
This is from the same night as this shot, and probably should have been posted then (or even as the month-end abstract,) but it wasn’t, so here it is because I’m not going to do much else with it. I like how confusing it is solely because the mist drops obscure the necessary details, but if you look closely, you may figure it out.

Or not. You’re looking at the tail and the hind leg of another Carolina anole (Anolis carolinensis) stretched out behind it as it sleeps on a very misty night – you can see the little claws curling upward over the larger drop, as if it was a dragon clutching the favorite bit of its hoard.

By the way, I’ve long thought that Gandalf and company missed a royal opportunity when they got ahold of the Palantir. We know Sauron could see everything through it, right? That’s an outright invitation to put it in view of the most gross or depraved things you can think of. Or even just some of the sitcoms that somehow got approved for production. Could he hear through it too? Because I can name a few bands that should be in that rotation. Gimme a week, I could make Sauron give himself up…

1 2 3 341