Mostly typical

sunset shot of Jordan Lake showing old tree trunks
I did a student outing to Jordan Lake three days back, now concentrating on more species than just the woodpeckers, but mostly seeing what I normally do, with a couple of exceptions. But first, an observation that I meant to post earlier and forgot. This sunset shot dates from the 14th – nothing exciting, just an illustration, because the next one is from the 18th.

midday shot of same location sans big trunk
In between, we had a wicked set of thunderstorms blow through, and I returned to find something had changed. The tall dead tree on the right had been a landmark ever since I started visiting this area, hosting woodpeckers and serving as a perch for countless birds, yet it had to go sometime. I wasn’t paying strict attention to it in the days leading up to this, but I never saw evidence of any woodpeckers nests within it this year, so here’s hoping I was correct. Another pine trunk had dropped right across the path out to this point, and I could at least examine that one for nest cavities; I found one that had been started, but was not deep enough to have hosted a nest.

On to the birds now.

summer tanager Piranga rubra peeking from foliage
Spotting this as soon as we got out of the car by following the nearby birdsong, I had initially identified this as a scarlet tanager, but I was wrong; this is a summer tanager (Piranga rubra) instead, which I should have guessed because it was the first day of summer, duh! It was the first I’d photographed, potentially the first I’d seen – I don’t keep spotting lists, just the pics.

The osprey were mildly active, more so than the combined times when I was out there for the woodpeckers.

osprey Pandion haliaetus shaking off water after a capture
This one had just snagged that fish not too far away from the fallen stump above, and had cut off in our direction. This is right as it shook off the water from making the capture, which they always do about 5-10 seconds after taking off again, as soon as they get a little safe altitude. The sun wasn’t at an ideal angle for either the bird itself, or to illuminate the spray from the action, though you can see a little against the one wing if you look closely.

osprey Pandion haliaetus looking derpy during a shake
Taking advantage of the motor drive, this frame is less than a second after the previous. Someone said this resembles me attempting to dance, which I don’t consider entirely accurate since I’ve never stood on a fish while doing so.

osprey Pandion haliaetus glaring at photographer for capturing that
And back to looking regal while glaring at us. Oh yeah, we saw that – we saw it all.

[I have a faint regret, as I review this post during editing, that I did not capture the osprey with its wings up a bit in mid-flap, since they might have mimicked those faint traces of clouds in the background – do you see the shape? Man, that would have been cool.]

osprey Pandion haliaetus backing just before dive
Not long afterward, another cruised in almost directly overhead and made a couple of false starts after fish before finally completing its dive; here it’s ‘backing,’ in a near-hover as it zeros in on the fish, calculating its dive. The tail is down for braking, and the talons starting to extend forward for the capture.

This time, some intervening trees obscured my view of the entry, but I likely wouldn’t have caught it anyway – the bird was so close that I was having trouble tracking it as it accelerated downward. I quickly dodged the trees and got a half-ass shot of it as it lifted from the water with its capture.

osprey Pandion haliaetus just lifting from water after capturing fish
I’ve watched eagles simply reach down beneath the surface and snag a fish in passing, but osprey always seem to dive, except it’s not head first but leading with the talons instead, naturally. This usually makes a distinct and noisy splash, but in my experience, it’s successful more often than not. I have yet to get the really cool entry pic, just as the osprey touches the water, but then again, I haven’t spent five hours out there after it yet either.

I did see a juvenile bald eagle cruise by in the distance, at a crummy light angle so little more than a silhouette, but then an adult came a lot closer, obscured by the nearby treeline while the angle was best but emerging enough for a decent identifying shot.

adult bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus gliding over
Not too far away around the point, some kids were making a bit of noise, and as the eagle passed overhead they set off some kind of mild fireworks, probably completely unaware of the bird nearby. The eagle took immediate evasive action though.

adult bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus veering into vertical bank because of noise
This is not tilted, or a significant change of angle from the last pic; the eagle really is banking almost vertically. It was quite brief, because the bird didn’t have enough altitude that it could afford to shed with the loss of its lifting surfaces in this way, so I’m glad I caught this – I wasn’t even aware that it banked this hard while watching it in the viewfinder.

black vulture Coragyps atratus portrait
In our wanderings (actually as we ‘pursued’ our next subject,) we came across a small flock of black vultures (Coragyps atratus) who were reluctant to give up their foraging grounds for mere nature photographers, and so we had the opportunity for some ridiculously close portraits – this is full-frame. Granted, when you do this you typically want something a leetle more photogenic that the Cathartidae, but at least we have those soulful brown eyes to gaze into, kinda like Eva Longoria’s…

In the distance, we could see a large bird sitting in another dead tree, and even at several hundred meters it was clearly not another vulture. Vultures have a hunched look, but eagles seem to sit up as straight as the class suck-up. So we started approaching cautiously, to see how close we could get before it spooked off.

We needn’t have bothered.

first-year bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus yawning in dead tree
There’s a chance that not only was this the juvenile bald eagle that I’d spotted passing in the distance earlier (it was the right general direction,) but also the one that had landed in the treetop above me a few days previously; it was only a half-kilometer from that point, and just as blasé about people being close – yes, that’s a big yawn. It was early evening and plenty of people were hanging out in the immediate area, including someone playing fetch with their dog in the water almost underneath this tree – easily the most mellow one I’ve seen, ever.

first-year bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus staring at photographer
This Christopher Lambert stare is wildly misleading, because the eagle allowed us to approach very close beneath and not only didn’t fly off, it took a little time to do some grooming. I have to admit, having a subject that doesn’t require a bit of skill to approach for frame-filling shots takes all the fun out of it.

[A day later, I was speaking to my brother on the phone, and he said that the avian flu was hitting his area hard, and they’d lost a bunch of eagles at Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge over it. I’m hoping that it doesn’t have that kind of effect here – it was purportedly brought in by the snow geese up there – but it also may be just a matter of time.]

We were down there for the sunset as well, which didn’t pan out too vividly (as usual,) but as the sun lowered and at least got a bit yellow, I framed a great blue heron (Ardea herodias) off in the middle distance.

great blue heron Ardea herodias in golden hour hues
I virtually always shoot at full-sunlight white balance, which translates to no color alteration at all – this keeps the nice sunset colors. At times it might be better with a little color correction, but I can typically do that in GIMP better than the presets of the camera anyway.

After the sun had disappeared and we were leaving, I turned and shot a quick scenic, only with the contrast and saturation boosted slightly, my setting to compensate for low-contrast light like overcast or deep shade. Which this wasn’t, so it made the sky appear a little better than it was.

weak sunset colors over Jordan Lake
That little stand of silhouetted tree in the water at lower left is the same one from the previous photo, only from the opposite side, more or less – the heron had moved on by this time. Overall, nothing too exotic this visit, but enough to make it a decent outing.

None. None more cyan

I was thinking I’d used a variation of this title before, but not according to my title list. It was probably one of the images…

Regardless, a little break before we get back to more birds.

damselfly likely skimming bluet Enallagma geminatum on leaf
This is one of those sorting finds that I just thought you needed to see the details of, a tiny damselfly from the yard. It’s likely a skimming bluet (Enallagma geminatum,) though I imagine it believes it’s better than that – you know how damselflies get. And while I’m here, do you think the name is pronounced, “Bloo-ett,” or simply, “Bloot?” Or it is French, and pronounced, “Brechck-FAH,” or something?

Never mind that now; let’s go in for a closer look.

damselfly likely skimming bluet Enallagma geminatum in detail
That’s some pretty intense blue right there, or cyan, or aqua, or whatever you want to call it. Here I am trying to do serious nature photography and this guy comes along looking like some hippy’s wall poster. Is this supposed to strike fear into the heart of mosquitoes, or just fascinate their toddlers? You’re trying to imagine mosquito toddlers in a little flying stroller right now, aren’t you?

I have nowhere I’m going with this.

Nature photographer’s lottery

adult and fledgling red-headed woodpeckers Melanerpes erythrocephalus eyeing one another at nest cavity
Given the success of previous efforts and the fact that I had the opportunity to pursue such actions, I’ve been making more trips down to Jordan Lake to try and keep an eye on the red-headed woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus) nest. It hasn’t been daily, nor for more than a couple hours at a time (mostly,) due to storms and heat and, you know, having a life. But this is something that I’ve been aiming to do, really, since I got serious about nature photography; it takes close attention and a lot of time to capture specific behaviors and events, and I’ve primarily been somewhere between, “catch something through sheer luck,” and, “wait around a bit, as long as it’s convenient,” and it was time for things to be a bit less convenient.

adult and fledgling red-headed woodpeckers Melanerpes erythrocephalus checking out surroundings
I was lucky in finding a nest that allowed good visibility with the long lens, as well as being able to hear the young, while still being far enough away that the adults weren’t spooked by my presence, especially since I had to be right out in the open for a decent perspective. True, it meant being knee-deep in the lake for these shots, but see the domain name; this is routine anyway.

adult and fledgling red-headed woodpeckers Melanerpes erythrocephalus feeding at cavity opening
The sun would rise almost dead behind the nest opening, though shrouded by the treeline of the forest canopy that the host tree borders, and as the sun progressed it would throw differing light on the nest, necessitating changes of position depending on the time of day. Before noon, I was often having to work in open shade, but I knew that more activity would take place not long after sunrise than when closing on sunset, even though the light was the best then.

Based on appearance and behavior, the young would be leaving the nest any day now – the question was how they’d do it, or what kind of warning they’d provide. Previous experience with songbirds like wrens and chickadees told me that the young would bail without really having a grip on controlled flying, managing an arrested descent down to the ground before mastering the finer points over the next few hours. This tree, however, was literally standing in the water, and anyway these were woodpeckers, so what was going to happen? I really wanted to find out.

adult and fledgling red-headed woodpeckers Melanerpes erythrocephalus facing off at nest
Gotta love the expression here. A friend recently commented about how many frames I took of the same subject, but this is why: it sometimes means capturing that key frame that only exists for a moment. I can easily discard those that didn’t work, or are mere duplicates.

adult red-headed woodpeckers Melanerpes erythrocephalus feeding fledgling
This is from the previous day, later in the afternoon, but well-lit and a great illustration. Video, of course, does better, and you had to know we were getting to that.

[I apologize for a couple of the transition errors in there, but it takes better than two hours to render and I’m not redoing it right this moment. If you’re failing to see them, it either means that I’ve gone back since and replaced the video, or you’re not paying attention…]

illustration of video rig used
This is the video setup, sans the stabilizing arm which came the next day, but showing the shooting position (this angle was a little shallower than others) and the microphone with the ‘dead cat’ wind screen – you can even see why it was necessary. The hanging wire is the remote (which stupidly works only for still photos,) used to try and keep my hands from vibrating the rig. Yes, I realize that raising the center column this way increases the vibration, but I had to frame with the LCD on the back of the camera and I’m not that short – using it lower would mean squatting down to frame and dragging my ass in the water, something I’m not averse to unless I’m wearing the camera bag (spare batteries, cards, and lenses) and the long lens case, which I was. That other little arm up top, by the way, is a V-bracket for the microphone, because for unknown reasons so many manufacturers put the hot-shoe mounting plate centered on their devices – good for balance, which is unnecessary for a device weighing a crummy 160 grams, and bad for putting your eye up to the viewfinder, so it has to be raised out of the way. The mic is a Takstar SGC-598, and a pretty slick performer for the trivial cost; you can easily pay ten times the price for other brands.

Oh, yeah, the eagle:

juvenile bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus perched in tree right overhead
As I said in the video, this is a juvenile bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus,) almost certainly this year’s brood – I never got a broadside view to confirm from the coloration. What possessed it to home in right to this spot, when I was plainly visible, I’ll never know, but the next image might give a clue.

juvenile bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus providing noble profile
C’mon, that pose and light angle? That’s mugging for the camera. This is easily the closest that I’ve been to a wild eagle, and I was hoping that a parent might come by with some food, even though it hardly seems necessary. But hey, I’m cool with what I got. This is full frame at 600mm (I was backed off slightly for the previous image,) and like I said, 12 meters or so off? It’s hard to judge accurately when looking upwards.

juvenile great blue heron Ardea herodias perched nearby
And the great blue heron (Ardea herodias,) another juvenile. There were a pair of them flitting back and forth in the immediate area for a short while, often getting chased off by adults who had already claimed that territory, but I couldn’t swing the camera around for video of that.

fledgling red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus within minutes of leaving the nest
This is the first fledgling to leave, probably only minutes or less before it occurred (the video timestamps aren’t parsed accurately by my system, for some reason.) It’s 7:09 AM, the sun still well below those trees in the background – getting the early start was a good move.

juvenile and neurotic red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus fledgling trying to get up nerve to leave the nest
And this was the second one, four hours and 21 minutes later; it would bail within the next half-hour. This was more time spent on the pursuit than I’d anticipated, and as I said, I started packing up myself at least twice before being induced to wait just a little bit longer. The entire time, I was standing behind the tripod out in the water, save for five minutes when I got out to take a leak. I take credit for the patience, but the timing was still a matter of luck, and having free time to take advantage of that helped a lot.

All of this started from a casual comment in a post earlier this year, and played out with more luck and success than I’m used to, while expanding my video stock by a ridiculous amount as well. I’m pleased, and now feel more like I’ve put in the effort of a serious photographer (whatever that is.)

Visibly different, part 25

unkknown woman in wedding gown for restoration
A little bit different approach this week, sparked by stumbling across this in my folders. I have no idea who this is, because the image was uploaded to a newsgroup dedicated to Photoshop as a challenge: to see who could restore it to an acceptable state. I wasn’t actively participating, but I downloaded it anyway to see what I could do with it, and according to the dates on the various files, it sat on my harddrive for almost a year before I tackled it. This was back in 2002/03 – they’ve been sitting in an old folder all that time, despite the fact that I’ve replaced harddrives at least seven times in that period. I could say I should probably do a bit more housecleaning, but then again, we wouldn’t have this example if I had.

There are, of course, no Photoshop filters than ‘fix’ damage like this, so it’s a lot of meticulous work in each aspect of damage: tracing the edges of the horrible cello tape, carefully following the cracks and folds, and all that jazz. Worst, I think, was the water/mildew staining giving a milky vague hue to some of the dark areas. And I don’t recall how many hours I spent on it, but the file dates progress over a few days at least. I also feel obligated to mention that I never took any kind of training in photo editing, being entirely self-taught with buttressing by the occasional web page that showed some cool technique. So how did it come out?

damaged photo restored to authentic monochrome
I look at this now and see where I could have done better, but overall, I think the original owner might never have noticed these and would have been pleased with the result. Or I could be dead wrong. It’s no Ecce Homo, though – I feel comfortable saying that.

But does a true monochrome image look ‘right?’ Chances are, the original back in the day had these hues, because that sepia coloration is a product of aging from the chemicals used at the time rather than what prints looked like when fresh, but we also expect to see this tone in old photos – it’s gravitas. So, another version with the sepia tone restored, just not as far.

restored image with sepia tone
Both of the restored images, by the way, were tweaked slightly just before this post was written, in two ways. The first is, I had never done the borders around the print, which still retained the lines and wrinkles and so on, but it made the images look odd, so I smoothed them back out (pure ‘white’ borders – that’s easy.) The second is, the sepia tone that I’d originally selected seemed a little too magenta, so I shifted it for this image.

While I would be curious to see what I could do with this now (given that the efforts that you see here were all made nineteen years ago,) I’m not so curious that I’d spend a few dozen hours on it – not even for a post. But another example may be along before the end of the year.

Extraneous

waning gibbous moon in daylight
I have a lot of video editing to do, which you will see the evidence of shortly – probably not tonight, but it should be within 24 hours anyway. Right now, I’m just throwing up a quick moon pic, taken early this morning as I was setting up the tripod – the detail came out nicely, and I didn’t even bother boosting contrast or anything. Just wanted to get something up in the interim, and this was completely unrelated to everything else I’ve been working on.

I paid my dues today, but you’ll hear all about that in a bit.

Meanwhile, can you spot Posidonius on the edge of Mare Serenitatis? You get asked that a lot, don’t you?

So far, so good

red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus nestling peeking from nest cavity
A week ago now, I posted about finding the nest of a red-headed woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus,) including being able to see the opening clearly enough that I should be able to spot the nestlings as they got bigger and closer to fledging out and leaving the nest. I don’t have direct experience with this species, but with others that I’ve observed, the period between peeking out and finally exiting the nest can be fairly short – sometimes only a few days. The point where they actually leave and start getting the flying thing down pat may be very brief, an hour or so before the nest is completely abandoned and they’re someplace else in the forest canopy. So the chances of my seeing this are quite slim, especially given that the nest and lake are 20 kilometers away. I may get that lucky, though I’m not holding my breath. Still, I’ve had more luck than usual this year.


I don’t know how many are in there; my Sibley guide says a typical clutch is 3-10 eggs, yet all I’ve ever seen is one head peeking out, while multiple times I’ve seen a parent with three berries in its beak, perhaps the best assessment of the number of chicks. The more the better, as far as I’m concerned, because it should mean a longer period as they individually get up their nerve to leave the nest, increasing my chances of seeing at least one do so. We’ll see.

parent red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus outside nest opening with beakful of insects
They’re striking birds, perhaps slightly larger than a robin (the American kind, which is a thrush,) and very active down at the lake. The nest is in a longneedle pine killed by lakeshore erosion, one of many in the immediate area.

parent red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus leaning way into nest cavity
This gives a little bit of an idea how big the nest cavity is, since we’ve already seen that the young are a decent size and the parent still has to lean in this far to feed.

red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus nestling peeking from nest cavity
I’m glad I switched sides to put the sun at my back. You can see that there are no signs of the hatchling down or fluff, this one pretty much looking like an adult bird of some other species, so I suspect they’re really not far from leaving the nest; thus, I’m also glad I went down there Tuesday evening. I went down yesterday evening as well, arriving too late to see much but at least confirming that the nest is still occupied. I should probably take a camp chair and some food and hang out for as long as I can, try to keep an eye on them.

tree with woodpecker nest
On packing up after sunset yesterday evening, I did a couple quick shots of the nest tree to illustrate things better. The nest sits between the two branches extending out to the right, facing right out over the water, so I have to wade out 8-12 meters to get a view of it – luckily it’s a shallow slope to the lake bottom there. On the upper branch you can see a bead which is one of the adults perching, perhaps settling in for the night. We’ll go in closer.

red-headed woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus on upper branch above nest cavity
You can’t see the nest opening from this angle, since it extends directly out to the right, but it’s about 1/3 down from the top branch; that little notch in the trunk among the pine needles might be the very edge of it. None of the greenery here is from this tree, but from the one behind it. Meanwhile, you can see how popular it is with the woodpeckers from all the other holes, and as I said, this is far from the only such tree in the area.

We need a better look at that osprey:

overheated and panting osprey Pandion haliaetus hunting from perch
Had I tried wading out to get this view, the osprey (Pandion haliaetus) would have quickly taken off, but since I was already in my spot out into the lake and holding largely motionless when it came by and perched, I got away with it. While I’m pleased to be able to do video now, there’s something frustrating about having two subjects simultaneously. Meanwhile, The Girlfriend was texting me at the same moment that I’m missing the beaver sitting complacently at the edge of the neighborhood pond and enjoying its meal. [Sigh]

I’ll close with a quick shot of the sunset sky from Tuesday evening as I was packing up. It was only a turkey vulture cruising past, but for a silhouette that’s fine.

sunset over Jordan Lake with vulture silhouette

Visibly different, part 24

What were you up to 35 years ago?

star trails around Polaris with meteor and plane
I was a bit surprised to find this one while reviewing my old negatives, because I don’t remember it at all. Nonetheless, I can pin it down to central New York in 1987, and even better, it most likely was taken on August 13th. Naturally, this is a long night exposure anchored on Polaris, the north star, and shows a long-trail meteor – probably. And definitely a jet, but you have to look carefully for it.

Immediately after this single frame in the strip is a pic of my dad proudly holding a giant mutated double-beet, but within another couple of frames are photos from Wildwood, NJ, from a trip I took there in August 1987. Using the webbernets, I determined that there was a meteor shower, the Perseids, peaking on August 13th, which was likely the reason that I tried this, my first attempt at a star trails exposure. And it really didn’t turn out half-bad, considering the film (Kodak 1000) and camera (Wittnauer Challenger.) And let’s face it: that’s a really distinct yellow-green meteor in there, a decent capture for the first attempt, and something that I’ve tried and failed to repeat or improve upon for decades.

There’s little possibility that it’s a satellite, especially since there were probably less than 1/10th the number then that there are now, not to mention that it’s ridiculously bright and not aligned with typical orbits. It isn’t a plane because there’s no evidence of strobes, like the faint line almost perfectly cutting across to Polaris. Which, in itself, helps put a time to it, because few flights took place after 10 PM in that area. And it isn’t a scratch, because it has a color and even grain to it. Let’s take a closer look.

inset of long exposure of star trails showing meteor and aircraft
In case you’re having a hard time seeing it, the aircraft descends from the top right corner straight towards Polaris, the non-streaked star at the focus of the arcs. The meteor, by the way, almost perfectly crosses the radiant of the Perseids meteors, which is not how it’s supposed to happen – it should be pointing at that spot, which means this probably wouldn’t be considered a Perseid meteor, but just a random one. There are also a few scratches visible in there, following the film travel through the camera and/or the processing machine, and I tweaked contrast a bit for web display, but really, it’s not that bad a shot. And then there’s my most recent example:

long night exposure with Tau Herculids meteor and firefly
Yeah, despite the years, equipment, and experience, not really an improvement, is it? Though I can say I’ve seen few as distinct as that first one, no matter what – central New York really was/is a much better place to see them than here in North Carolina, solely because of the lower humidity and light pollution. This becomes evident as we look at some others over the years.

star trails time exposure over palm tree
Florida, 2003 I believe? I’m pretty sure this is the same night, perhaps even the exact same time, that I found the trapped water snake and worked to free it while the camera shutter was open. Probably a 20 minute exposure aimed south, and not too bad considering the crappy negative film I was using. Composition-wise, I like this one the best.

one-hour time exposure of star trails with too much background light
We’re into the digital realm now, the Canon 300D/DReb, in January 2010, and this is a one-hour exposure aimed northwest – Polaris is out of the frame to the right. Color is remarkably unimpressive, but that’s mostly due to the light scattered by humidity. The trees are lit up by the porch lights of my neighbor, very indirectly, but it’s a one-hour exposure. I did this at home so I could go inside without standing out there for the entire hour in January, because I’m a wimp.

But my favorite, slide film from 2005 I think:

long exposure star trails going slowly defocused
I can’t take credit for the idea, because I saw this someplace else and had to try it, but it came out damn well. This is a long exposure (ten minutes I believe) where, every 30 or 45 seconds, I defocused the lens just a tiny bit more, making the stars go fuzzier as they traveled across the sky. Provia 400F, most likely with the Sigma 24-135mm at f2.8 to control the bokeh and keep the depth purposefully short. I really need to revisit this technique again.

But no, it’s no meteor…

Slightly more exotic

On Wednesday, I made a trip out to a coastal region of North Carolina, specifically the Wilmington/Fort Fisher area – not my first choice of beachy areas, but I had a reason to be out there that wasn’t photo-related. Nonetheless, I left early and managed to be out at Fort Fisher shortly after 7 AM, seeing what the morning held.

dead scrub brush on Care Fear Inlet with boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major
I took a little opportunity to be fartsy while looking for the species that can only be found coastally, like the boat-tailed grackle (Quiscalus major) appearing at the top of the scrub here – I can’t call it driftwood because it grew right there and is still firmly anchored. The grackle itself wasn’t too concerned about my presence and allowed a surprisingly close approach while chuckling and clattering its morning calls.

boat-tailed grackle Quiscalus major viewing photographer unconcernedly
The sun angle wasn’t ideal and I forgot to dial in some compensation for the sky, but I liked the eyes peering from the silhouette, so I kept this one. Considering that I was only using a 135mm focal length here, you get a decent idea of how close I was. The bird remained there long after my approach, undoubtedly used to touristas.

dragonfly possibly Blue Dasher Pachydiplax longipennis on bare branches against sky
This is about a half-size crop, making use of the stark branches – the dragonfly may be a female blue dasher (Pachydiplax longipennis,) but I won’t swear by it.

pair of fiddler crabs Ocypodidae in mild territorial faceoff
It was low tide, and the fiddler crabs were out in force – more or less. Generally, the mud flats ahead of me would show sudden subtle movements on my approach as the multitudes of crabs (genus Ocypodidae – there are dozens of species and I’m not going to try to identify these) took cover at the sight of me, but waiting motionless for no more than a minute would reveal them peeking back out of their burrows again, and soon afterward they’d be out foraging or, in this case, engaging in a mild territorial dispute, pretty much just bumping one another in the most lame of encounters – that’s the burrow of the smaller one right there in the foreground. One of these days I intend to do some detailed video, but I had no ground pad nor sunscreen and the sweat was already dripping down my spine. Next time.

Brown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) were gliding by out over the Cape Fear River, and I did a few shots as they passed.

brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis gliding only centimeters above surface
You’re not mistaken: that’s the bird’s shadow directly underneath, indicating that it was cruising only a handful of centimeters above the water’s surface. This was still quite distant, but I soon got the opportunity for a few closer images.

brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis gliding overhead
Still not the best light angle, but I liked the pose and the wingtips.

trio of brown pelicans Pelecanus occidentalis stacked up by telephoto compression
Telephoto compression is a cool effect sometimes – I’d gotten the 150-600mm out by now, and the forced perspective stacked this trio together. There were actually four, but one was being more protective of its personal space. I’m fairly certain this was a family unit, two of them being this year’s brood.

Now we get to the rails.

clapper rail Rallus crepitans on mound in marsh grasses
A pair of other photographers drew my attention to this clapper rail (Rallus crepitans,) which was sitting more-or-less under my nose – I’d been looking further out and not into the marsh grasses nearly at my feet. This was also during my initial review of the area, and the long lens was still back in the car, so this is at 135mm. The picture is deceptive, especially with that mound of dead reeds that the bird is standing on, because the grasses are knee-high and superbly dense – the rail is roughly the size of a green heron, or a little bigger than a crow, and the grasses stand twice as high. This was driven home when I began hearing the calls from what I took to be two different nests, plainly within 10 meters dead in front of me, yet nothing at all could be seen. But I did record it on my smutphone at least.

Clapper rails (Rallus crepitans) calling

The rail had vanished by the time I returned with the long lens, and I watched one appear and disappear a bit more distantly, but eventually I saw one up on another mound, industriously preening, and stalked it slowly to get some more detailed images.

clapper rail Rallus crepitans eyeing photographer
There was no cover whatsoever, so I counted on slow movement and frequent pauses, and the rail would eye me warily for a few moments, especially if I trod noisily on a dried reed (which was completely unavoidable – the marsh was littered with them,) and then immediately go back to preening. This is where the Profiles shot, two posts back, came from of course.

clapper rail Rallus crepitans in marsh grasses
Eventually, I had a decent selection of images in good light, and I backtracked without spooking the rail away. I have no idea how long it will be before the young leave the nest, so I likely won’t be there for it (especially since this is about a three-hour drive away,) but at some point before too long I’ll be returning to see what can be found, regardless.

There was one other species that I stalked, getting better photos than I had ever before but still not what I wanted to get.

American oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus among splashing waves
This is an American oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus,) smaller than the rails at close to pigeon-sized, and considerably less tolerant of approaches than they are of splashing water. I tracked this one for at least fifty meters along a rock breakwater extending south from the point, never getting any closer, never sure if the bird was purposefully keeping its distance from me or if I was just keeping pace with its foraging path – I’d say the first was more likely. I really wanted a nice close portrait of those eyes and beak, but it was not to be.

foraging American oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus showing three leg bands
I did, at least, get clear enough frames to see that the bird had been banded three times, so someone had gotten close to it, repeatedly.

But for a little over an hour of poking around, this wasn’t too bad of a photographic haul, worth getting a little muddy and a lot sweaty. It is not enough of a beach trip to sustain me, but it was a decent start anyway.

Hey, I was here first!

Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis on tip of fence post
The other day while checking the progress of the various plants in the backyard (and whether they’d escaped further attentions of the local deer,) I spotted this Carolina anole (Anolis carolinensis) failing to be inconspicuous. They’ve been a lot scarcer lately, so I was pleased to see it – but it became apparent the feeling was not mutual. Realizing that its location wasn’t secure, it hopped down to the crossbar and scampered along a short distance, then paused and extended its dewlap.

Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis with extended dewlap
I’d said before that I was a little suspicious that a previous display was aimed at me rather than another anole, and thus started a visual search for any others; I saw none. This isn’t conclusive by any stretch, because they can be pretty subtle at times, not to mention simply on the other side of the fence out of my immediate sight. Trying to determine where they’re looking is almost as inconclusive, since they have eyes on both sides of the head and will move their eyes rather than their head if they can. Yet, at all times it could clearly have an eye on me as well.

Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis bobbing upright on fence post
I moved to a different position on the other side, trying for a head-on shot along the fence, but the anole took another upright perch on a post again, and began bobbing its head almost immediately.

Carolina anole Anolis carolinensis displaying dewlap again
…annnddd there’s the dewlap again, still without seeing another anole around. I’m 90% certain of it now: the anole is displaying to tell me to get lost, which I never thought they’d do – I figured they’d just go for cover if they felt my presence was unwanted/dangerous. It’s amusing that they’re territorial enough to try and chase me off. After I planted several ginger lilies within a couple meters of this spot, too. I was accommodating and moved on, letting this one continue in peace. Not out of fear, mind you – I just had better things to do. That’s all.

Profiles of Nature 53

Yes. Yes, indeed.

clapper rail Rallus crepitans "Fuffudio" getting overdramatic
This week month Profile we have Fuffudio, shown here during her audition for the latest big screen comic book adaptation, Snuffy Smith: Still Distillin’; she’s performing Loweezy’s reaction to a shortage of squirrels for the stew. Fuffudio was determined to immerse herself in method-acting to prepare for the role of a hillbilly mama, but her family flatly refused to help – we’re just gonna leave that out there. Like many aspiring actingbeings, she’s had to work odd jobs while waiting for her big break, but picking something close to LA probably would have worked better than Foreign Diplomat to Kyrgyzstan, especially since she can’t pronounce it (“foreign,” we mean, not “Kyrgyzstan.”) Fuffudio is devoutly religious, but it’s a religion that disavows fervency, so she spends her Sundays being intensely indifferent; one of her fellow parishioners is capable of Shrugging in Tongues. She’s very adventurous when it comes to the bedroom, though many of her partners are turned off by the quicksand. Fuffudio’s childhood was a little rough because her parents enrolled her in obedience school by mistake (it sounded French,) but if she gets this part, she wants to attend her ten-year reunion to rub their noses in it. C’mon, you should have seen that coming. Her hobby is buying materials to take up new hobbies but not actually doing anything with them, probably the most common hobby there is. Yet she’s musically-inclined, but hopes to correct that with a change in diet. Fuffudio asserts quite proudly that her favorite accommodation of a shitty product is a shoehorn.

Join us next, um, Profile when we have another Profile! Embrace the suck!

[Yeah, you’d hoped they were over, but let’s be real: we’ve gone five entire months without one, which is far longer than intended, and when we got this image there was no question that they had to return. Even better, now you have no idea how many more there might be.]

1 81 82 83 84 85 318