Glutton for punishment?

I know I am. That’s why you’ll see me down at the lake in a few nights, because the Perseids meteor shower is peaking on August 12th, but of course, you’re likely to still see some within a few days before or after, so whenever the conditions suit you, have at it.

The nicer bit is, the moon will be a waxing crescent, so setting in the early part of the evening and long gone by midnight, which is when the best opportunities begin. The satellites, of course, will still be there, but again, past midnight fewer of them show because the sun is blocked by the Earth for all but the farthest ones, or those nearer the poles.

You have plenty of time to plan, so boot up Stellarium or check out Heavens Above and see what satellites might go through for your area. Or just scout out some prime locations to do long exposures within, preferably something with a nice foreground – maybe you’ll get extremely lucky and get a nice brilliant bolide over top of something scenic. The possibilities are endless! Extremely thin, granted, and requiring a shitload of luck, but still endless – an infinitely long hair.

One of these days, I’ll have an image to illustrate these announcements…

I did

Meaning, I did go back out to see how things looked after the rain, as I closed the previous post with. However, since these are displayed in reverse order, newest first, this post appears above that one and well away from that simple statement, ruining the continuity and requiring all this explanation. Plus there’s no sense of building drama or developing photo accomplishments, unless you’re reading these as soon as they post. Man, I can’t tell you how often simple formatting issues cramp my style…

All that aside, more froglets.

juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea on stem
I shot two photos purposefully for scale comparison, keeping the magnification the same for each (easy enough to do with a manual focus lens – these are at closest focus for the Mamiya 80mm macro, without the extension tube.) Above is the juvenile, while below is an adult found less than half a meter off. Maybe someday I’ll be able to get both in the same frame.

adult green treefrog Hyla cinerea on sapling
You should already know that adults don’t get more than 60mm in length, roughly the same size as the one seen here (even though that’s a different species.)

This time around, though, the frogs were being much more dynamic in their poses, and not leaping away half as often. Was this due to the rain, or was I being more inconspicuous, or something else entirely? Got me, but I’ll take advantage of it all the same.

wet juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea spread across weeds
I’m pleased with this pose, partially because I know they won’t hold it for long and will typically leap away within a few seconds – which this one did. Before that happened, I captured this nice ‘action’ shot that also shows the abundant moisture and gives a hint of scale, since you can see the water forming ‘webs’ across the joints and a nice droplet at the bottom of that flowering sprig. Also note how transparent that uppermost foot is. Kewl.

juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea sitting up on reed
A note about behavior. Treefrogs show no curiosity at all, and generally display two types of response to approach by a photographer (or at least, by me): Getting away, or hunkering down in place, legs tucked, and pretending they’re just a brilliant green, shiny, striped, bump on a log. So when this one actually sat up higher as if trying to see something better, right as I was lining up directly in front for the portrait angle, I was a little surprised. I’m not sure what that was about, but again, I’ll take it.

bronze juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea preparing to leap
Just a lovely color variation. Is this what writers means when they refer to someone as a “bronze goddess?” It’s certainly what I’m going to imagine from now on.

Seriously, the color variations were all over the place, and I’m not sure how much control the frogs have over this; is it largely genetic, or do they alter it to suit the situation, and if so, how quickly does this take place? I’m fairly certain that, if it does occur, it’s much slower than the Carolina anoles, because I’ve watched that happen – it can take place in a few seconds. I’ve never been able to keep track of an individual frog, or even differentiate one, over a period of days to see if they change and when but, judging from the variants that I see in the same locations where I’ve been observing a particular one, it seems to be occurring. Annnddd now I have a new project.

juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea looking up belligerently
The faintly belligerent expression, coupled with that one leg sweeping down in a smooth curve to open toes as if it just swatted at something, prompted me to call this one, “Damn Biplanes.” Hopefully that reference isn’t lost.

[Another note: I wanted an upward angle for one of my subjects this morning, and spotted this one in a decent position to exploit, but like most of them, it was quite low to the ground, which is still wet from the rain. I hadn’t thought to bring along a ground pad, essentially a tough sheet of vinyl that I use to prevent my ass from getting wet, so I was endeavoring to get the correct angle while sacrificing only my knee to the muddy terrain. I couldn’t quite get as low as I wanted, and it was an awkward and uncomfortable position, but the result is more than satisfactory.]

And finally, we revisit the molting mantis, because as I passed, it was in a nice position for the portrait, and I couldn’t resist.

juvenile Carolina mantis Stagmomantis carolina posed underneath leaf
I’m pretty sure this is the exact same leaf that it molted on so, lazy day or so for the mantis. Hell, even I get around more than that, and I have a handy fridge of food. Then again, from the expanded size just in the past week, it appears to be finding enough food, so who am I to judge?

Not even a day

Man, I didn’t even have the ‘Sort’ folders cleaned out for an entire 24 hours before I had to add to them again. Not that this is a problem – I can quit anytime I like…

Last night, I was poking around the yard a little by the light of the headlamp and ran across a couple of subjects worthy of getting the camera for, and so I did, crazy and unpredictable person that I am. One of those is below:

Carolina mantis Stagmomantis carolina in middle of molt
You’ve seen this one before, because of course you watch all of my videos the moment they’re posted (surely one of the two people subscribed) – this is the second mantis getting favored by my generous misting, a Carolina mantis (Stagmomantis carolina.) The scale is difficult to discern here, as it was before except for the water drops, but it was roughly 40mm in length now, nearly twice the size that it was earlier; maybe I should have cut back on the water a little. I just confirmed that measurement by going out while typing this to check, since it hasn’t left that spot now almost a day later. Yes, it’s the same one, found in almost the exact same place in an area sparse for mantids of any kind. This is the latter stages of molting, with the exoskeleton that formerly covered its entire body sitting there towards the top of the frame. That never seems right, thought I guess insects might feel the same if they see a discarded bodysuit of ours lying around. I bet they do.

Earlier that day, I’d been at the neighborhood pond briefly and saw a lot of activity among the higher reeds and plants on the water’s edge – lots of stems swaying suddenly and wildly from the jumps and landings of something, though I was having a hard time actually seeing what; I’d spotted both a tiny treefrog and a grasshopper when searching, so it could have been either, but I suspected the frogs. So, after the mantis, I went across to see what showed by the headlamp, knowing it would be easier to spot the source if they couldn’t see me (the light not being identified as a threat.) As I suspected…

juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea on reeds
… a lot of juvenile green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea,) newly emerged from tadpole stage, were loitering about the various plants like hooligans. I cropped wider on this one to show that one leaf, which gives an impression of size a little better – the largest of the frogs (and this was not one of them) didn’t exceed 20mm in length. They had the widest variety of colors that I’ve seen, from brilliant gold to almost mud grey, but all with that faint translucence that helps show that they’re young.

It took little effort to see scads of them, and only a little playing around to communicate this photographically.

three juvenile green treefrogs Hyla cinerea in close proximity
Inserting anything for scale would have spooked them off, but these are just plain ol’ planty plants, garden weed kind of things – I wouldn’t quite have been able to touch the outermost two with the fingers of my spread hand, but my foot would have spanned the gap.

two juvenile green treefrogs Hyla cinerea hanging out on reeds
I got lucky with these two in that they were close together, facing upward, and not spooked off by my close approach (I make every effort to be unobtrusive, but leaning in amongst all the plants without disturbing them, as well as keeping camera and hands out of the beam of the headlamp to not betray my nature, while obtaining a clear shot at a decent angle, isn’t always successful.) These reeds probably measure about 3mm in diameter.

very tiny juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea hiding in leaf shadows
This was the tiniest, literally small enough to perch on your fingernail, but in my endeavors to get close enough for a good shot, the frog became suspicious and backed up further within the shelter of the leaves, making it impossible to get the flash at a decent angle – yeah, the flash unit on its separate arm with attached softbox also figures into the equation, and can also disturb leaves – the quarters are tight when you try to get in close. A ringflash would work in such circumstances, but I largely stopped using one because I never liked the way it rendered the light, plus the highlights and reflections look ridiculous.

lone juvenile green treefrog Hyla cinerea looking unconvincingly earnest
This is my favorite by far, not just for the detail and the color rendition (if a little bright,) but especially for the expression – I could have saved it for a Profiles post, but naaahhh. It has that unconvincingly guileless look of the kid that’s listening to admonitions to behave while you’re gone, and you just know you’re gonna be taking away a Playstation when you return.

I’m motivated to go back out and see how things look now, after a decent rain (finally,) but wanted to get this post out before midnight. Can’t have too many gaps – people will think I died…

Profiles of Nature 31

unidentified mating grasshoppers possibly Orphulella Zlatina and Wyeduck
You tell us, which is most horrid: The dread of the impending Profiles post, or the content that exceeds your worst imagination?

Doesn’t matter, really – we only ask to try and sound like we care. Today we meet the lovely and talented Zlatina: singer, dancer, actress, writer, and budding politician, along with her husband Wyeduck, who’s had a small part in two bombed TV pilots but manages to appear in nearly all of Zlatina’s promotional photos. It’s been fun watching the media trying to establish conjoined names for them. They met at a celebrity charity event and bonded over their mutual love of trashing Oprah, and the fact that there aren’t too many Orphulella at such events; they’re not even sure they are Orphulella, to be honest, since entomologists are never invited. Zlatina is a natural, well-rounded (ahem) talent, adapting easily to new challenges and always ready to push her boundaries, while Wyeduck flunked out of the acting school taught by the Olsen twins. Nonetheless, he believes he’s only inches from being discovered, not realizing that he’s already been discovered, much like that experimental eggplant casserole intentionally forgotten in the back of the fridge that no one wants to deal with right now. Zlatina, meanwhile, manages to glom onto every last fad and conspiracy droolpuddle that comes along, thinking that believing in things that almost no one else does makes her clever; she pronounces, “mainstream,” like most people say, “diaper blowout.” Some have speculated that this is why Zlatina’s agents allow Wyeduck to keep appearing, to draw attention away from her various soapboxes, but aside from that being yet another droolpuddle in itself, it would require talent agents to have reasoning powers; ’nuff said. Wyeduck’s favorite way to describe the USB-B connector shape is, “Six-sided, but not evenly,” while Zlatina’s is, “Almost like a little barn.”

Weeks. There’s weeks left. And only seven days in each. That’s like no time at all in between.

New York: A little more scenery

Let’s see – the photo and video sorting is all done (no small task, this,) tomorrow’s Profiles post is written created typed spawned… let’s have a handful of the remaining photos from the second New York trip. I didn’t do a lot of scenics this time around, partially because the weather wasn’t as cooperative, but I still snagged a few.

sunrise across docks on Cayuga Lake, NY
I don’t think I set my alarm to get up for sunrise even once on this trip, and most times I sleep well past it because I’m up into the wee hours of the morning on what I still consider the previous day. But having busy days, no internet access, and sleeping with the windows open meant I was up at sunrise every day, I believe, even when it was raining. The birds just outside the window, getting noisy at first light, probably helped more than a little. This is, of course, Cayuga Lake, one of the Finger Lakes, though you’re only seeing across the cove here.

How about if we face almost entirely in the opposite direction, the following day?

red sun just above horizon, Cayuga Lake, NY
This is the same sunset as the teaser photo here, and gives a little better impression of the lake, though the short focal length makes things look farther away than reality, while that other photo makes them look much closer – 18mm for this one, 85mm for the linked page. For the record, the lake is less than 2 km wide here.

scene along Cayuga-Seneca Canal, Seneca Falls, NY
We made it into Seneca Falls twice while there; this particular time while we were waiting for something to open. The weather couldn’t decide if it wanted to keep raining or clear up, and it actually started raining again while we were here, chasing us back to the car. This is the Cayuga-Seneca Canal, a branch of the Erie Canal system, and that bridge in the distance served as Frank Capra’s inspiration for the bridge scene in the schmaltzy It’s A Wonderful Life – possibly, anyway. I’d always heard it was the shooting location, which I found out recently is wrong, and now it appears that Seneca Falls being the inspiration for the fictional Bedford Falls in the film is all inference anyway, since Capra never said as much – he just spent time in Seneca Falls. Never mind that the women’s rights movement got its main impetus there, or any of the other history therein – it’s notable because of the movie. [Heavy sigh]

Seneca Knitting Mill on Cayuga-Seneca Canal, Seneca Falls, NY
There are a lot of older and historic buildings in Seneca Falls, many more than most of the surrounding towns and cities, but we weren’t really on a sightseeing tour, so I have only this. The Girlfriend and I did discuss what it would be like living in one, with the older structures and plumbing and the town breathing down your neck regarding their standards for historic buildings. It was bad enough living in an older house when I was growing up, with countless heating and insulation problems, frequent failures of the well pump, and so on. Thanks, give me a modern house anytime.

[Well, if you’re giving me a house, I’ll take whatever you got, but an older one would probably be sold off as soon as your back was turned, historic or not.]

band of clouds catching early sun at sunrise, Cayuga Lake, NY
Despite being out there ready, none of the sunrises really bowled me over this time around, even though on average they were performing better than here in NC around Walkabout Estates. Waiting for some good colors or sunbeams or anything, all I could work with on this morning was the golden light catching a band of lower clouds – even the birds avoided passing in a picturesque way.

One for curiosity’s sake.

doubled lightning bolt through window of Gatsby mansion, NY
During the somewhat frustrating electrical storm, one of the smaller bolts seen through the window of the Gatsby mansion displayed a curious trait. It looks like the camera moved during exposure, though you can see everything else is clear and sharp; it was actually the lightning (or perhaps more accurately, the air mass that it was in) that moved. This was after the fierce wind had rolled in, so it’s possible the charged air really did shift that much between the millisecond flashes of the bolt. The camera was on a tripod and I was even triggering with a remote release, so don’t go blaming me.

And one last one, on the lake again.

deep violet afterglow in sunset twilight across Cayuga Lake, NY
This is the same evening as the red sun shot above, but after getting the photos of the buck in the developing fog – I can’t knock these colors, as simple as it is. Somewhere within this view is where the major lightning strike occurred (not the one seen above, which is further off, but the one not exactly seen here,) though we weren’t on this dock then. Which is good – a huge bolt striking that point, or even closer on the water itself, is not how storms should be witnessed.

More of the shit I get up to

Back in 2015, I raised a question, or at least, pointed out that an answer could be determined, based on the details visible within a photo shown therein, reproduced in more detail below:

crescent moon by Union Station, Nashville, 1991
This was a photo that I took, with my cheesy little camera and crappy print film, while on a training seminar to Nashville, Tennessee, and in the post, I claimed that the date could be determined just from the details within the photo.

Which I did: November 9th, 1991. Maybe.

Okay, not all of that was from details within the photo, though I maintain that it could have been. Maybe. Given some more sources of info, anyway. But here’s how I arrived there.

First off, I knew it was 1991, because I bought a souvenir there that a psychotic girlfriend stole in 1992, and in 1990 I’d just moved to NC and wasn’t even working for the place that sponsored the trip. And I knew it was late in the year since one of the taller buildings was advertising ‘Visit xmas Village’ by leaving the lights on in certain offices at night. That’s about the extent of the information that I contributed through personal recollection, and I’m not sure these couldn’t have been determined from the photo. For instance, the clock tower is missing the statue of Mercury atop it, which pinned down at least a bracket of certain years.

Screenshot from Google Maps of Union Station, Nashville, TNThe shooting location was determined through Google Earth, confirmed through Google Maps Street View (normally, you could do this through Google Earth too, except that the latest versions don’t work in Linux, and Street View won’t work anymore on the older version that does work on Linux.) Most especially, the angles of the various points on the façade pinned down the spot on the sidewalk, within maybe a handful meters or less, which led the next step.

In Google Earth, the shooting angle and the compass direction of the moon could be determined from this latitude and longitude (222°, give or take – notice how the moon lines up directly above that chimney-like peak.) The clock reads 5:17, obviously PM from the afterglow towards the west, and Nashville is on Central Time.

I could not determine for sure the height that the moon was above the horizon, because I could find no info on how high that clock tower is, which would have given me the elevation of the moon. Eventually, I found a full height photo of Union Station (from ground to above the clock tower) with someone in the photo for a reference, and in GIMP translated the pixel position in rough length/height references. Very rough estimate: the clock sits 34 meters up.

Back to Google Earth. Measurement of the clock from my shooting location was about 147 meters. Some simple calculations (done with an online right-angle calculator, though, because my math skills are untrustworthy) gave an elevation for the moon of 13°. That info carried over into Stellarium, where I could input the location (including ground altitude) and the time, then begin sliding days back and forth until the moon got into the right position.

No day was a tight match, but this was not unexpected. Using Google Earth and Google Maps, with the Streetview function, to pin down the shooting location has some slop, especially since the vehicle producing their photographs obviously wasn’t on the sidewalk where I was, and there’s a bit of wide-angle lens distortion from their photos. The same can be said for the aerial photos – change the dates on any given location with taller buildings and watch the positions shift depending on how far they were from the camera axis. Significant changes in distance produce only trivial changes in apparent angle, and of course, my tower height measurements were pretty off-the-cuff. But November 9th has the moon at 222° compass bearing, just over 15° elevation, and that’s the closest I can produce for that particular time of day (perhaps the most accurate part of all this) and location. I feel comfortable with it, at least until I can get anything more accurate to work with. November 9th of 1991 was a Saturday, which fits with the three-day seminar as well.

Anyway, that was two hours of sleuthing for no good reason, other than to see if I could do it with the tools at hand.

Waited too long

Early this morning, what I still consider “last night,” I was getting bleary but knew that I might have a shot at the moon after about 1:30 AM, so I hung out until it would have risen above the horizon, which around Walkabout Estates is fairly high – there are trees all over the place. As I said a couple of days ago, in two days the sun would be setting on Tycho, and thus I’d have my chance to get sunset (instead of sunrise, two weeks hence) on the central peak. On cue, I gathered the long lens and tripod and went out to the front lawn, where there’s a narrow window when the moon is visible down the road before it enters the neighbors’ trees. The moon was there, burnt orange, but partially obscured by clouds and, as I watched, disappeared within. Nertz.

I waited it out though, and lo! it reappeared, nice and clear for at least a few minutes. Still orange and very dim, so I boosted ISO, went wide open (which is f6.3 for the Tamron 150-600,) and fired off a number of frames, using mirror lock-up with at least two seconds of delay, usually longer. The dimness did not help my manual focusing, but there were still enough details visible that a few of the frames were critically sharp.

orange waning crescent moon with no light on Tycho's central peak
This is right after 2 AM, and the detail is fine (this is admittedly full resolution) – enough to show that I was too late. The deep crater down low on the terminator is Tycho; see that point of light on the peak in the center of the crater? Yeah, me neither – the sun had already set low enough to no longer illuminate the peak. If you’d been standing on that mountaintop, you would only be seeing the pink afterglow in the sky above the moon, no vestige of the sun itself anymore. Okay, no, you probably wouldn’t see anything more than a faint haze of pale light hugging the horizon, from the tiny bit of dust orbiting the moon, since it takes atmosphere to produce anything more. But yeah, I should have been out there sooner.

In all reality, the sun may have set for that peak hours ago, long before it would have been in sight for my longitude, since a lunar day is nearly a month long – I don’t have software slick enough to pin it down that tightly. And that’s okay – it’s a quest partially because it is difficult to time correctly. And partially because I’m weird and have some peculiar obsession over it. After all, I got sunset on Maurolycus, which is where the In Crowd vacation; Tycho is for poseurs and the riff-raff.

On a whim, I went out just now, while typing this (well, I paused and left the computer behind in the office,) to see what the moon looked like now, at 11:30 AM – you know, to make the post really quality. And it looks far worse than this pic, because we’re somewhere between hazy and overcast right now and they ain’t no damn thing to see. But I made the effort, and that counts, right?

Squeezing one in

I thought I might get a few last photos up from the NY trips, but then when out in the yard watering plants, I saw some potential video opportunities. Some of these clips have been attempted before and never panned out, but this time luck was with me.

Note: The voiceovers are off the cuff (obviously,) but this also means that I can occasionally forget something, like the fact that the first subject had vanished before I returned with the misting can and the camera (which I mentioned,) so I flushed it out with a quick spray of mist over the area where it had last been seen (which I’d forgotten to mention.) This was sufficient; it popped back into sight at the prospect of getting a drink, and so I could get the video I was after.


This puts me one closer to the half-ass goal I’ve had since the beginning of the year, which is a post for every day. I don’t know why I keep this in the back of my mind, because I know it’s not gonna happen and I’m already well behind, but the week I was away and didn’t even have time to line up some posts ahead of time motivated me to ‘catch up,’ and so this month contains (as of now) 28 posts – not bad, really. I’m curious to see where the year will end up, since my free time tends to fluctuate, but at least I’m feeling a lot more comfortable with the video editing – dog knows why.

I also had a goal of a podcast per month, annnddd, we’re presently at five, so… yeah. I like to think the videos fill in, and they take the same amount of effort even though they’re much shorter. I’ll leave the evaluation of my performance up to you (the nonexistent reader/viewer/listener.) But you know, they say money is a great motivator…

Chinese mantis Tenodera sinensis in short depth-of-field

July to me?

Another long, eventful month to wave toodle-oo to, and so we have the month end abstracts. And all three were shot within the month, so, good on me? I guess that depends on how good the photos actually are.

twisted tree bark in closeup
From an outing early win the month with the Unforeseeable Mr Bugg (who it appears is not dead,) this was one of the few images worth keeping – at least by my standards, and that word is used with almost cavalier abandon. I might have had to tell you what this was if it wasn’t for the little bit of lichen in there.

Moving on.

dewy spider web seen edge on at sunrise
One thing that I regretted not doing on the first NY trip was checking out a walking trail in Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge, and after dropping The Girlfriend off at the airport the morning of my last day there on the second trip, I realized it was my last chance. Not a lot to see, but the low sun and the still-present dew made this pop out, and I cropped tighter to draw attention to the scribbled detail.

And finally,

willet Tringa semipalmata peering from reeds in Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge, NY
I’d somehow missed this one when doing the post about the refuge, and better pics will be along eventually, but I liked the nature of it here, so it’s a late addition to the lineup. This is a willet (Tringa semipalmata,) and there were at least a couple of them lurking about – this one got chased off soon after by a territorial rival. Yes, of course this was manual focus – autofocus would have just freaked out and gone on a vandalism spree until tackled by numerous police officers.

All right, August, let’s see what you have for us…

Are you kidding me?

I’d seen the skies looking quite clear yesterday evening, the first time in days, so I thought I’d try for the meteor storm, and early this morning (like a little after midnight,) I drove down to Jordan Lake, the best night sky spot in the area, to see what I could see.

The first thing was, the humidity was very high and the haze had rolled in, so only stars of higher magnitude were visible anyway, but what I was hoping to get weren’t the little, typical ‘shooting stars’ but a bolide, a nice fireball or at the very least, a brilliant, larger example – those would come through despite the haze.

On the first frame, I had the custom function of Long Exposure Noise Reduction set to ‘Auto,’ so it activated itself for the 800 second (13 minute, if you don’t know metric) exposure. Don’t do this; the noise reduction process can take as long as the damn exposure does, so I spent quite a while simply waiting for that to finish, unable to take any more exposures of the sky during that period, nor even turn the damn thing off in anticipation of the next frames.

time exposure of night sky with in-camera noise reduction
It gets rid of sensor noise, but that’s a lot faster to do after the fact, and it didn’t significantly reduce the blotchiness of the night sky otherwise, which you’ll see in a second. And playing with the menu during the process might have been responsible for the bit below.

higher-resolution inset of night sky time exposure with trail anomalies
This is almost a full-resolution inset, and you can see that the color speckling is still present. This is ISO 400, by the way, so not particularly prone to this – any higher ISO setting would be progressively worse. But note the star trails themselves, and the little squiggle off to one side. I would put this down to tripod vibration in the stiff breeze, or even bumping the tripod, except that this doesn’t make sense. First off, in the length of exposure, vibration of any kind would be too minimal to register, taking place over the period of a second or two at most, and the stars would have barely moved across the frame in that time. Second, it displaces only to one side and returns right back to the original path, like the tripod was bouncing against the ground, prevented from going further to the right than it had been. For gaps to appear in the paths, ones that left squiggles behind, the tripod would have had to have moved that way very slowly, at least over ten seconds – and then returned to exactly where it was. In other words, horseshit. I can find no other reasoning than the process of noise reduction itself.

I shot several exposures, in some cases while watching the same area of sky, and in others watching all over the place. I caught a small flicker that might have been a meteor, out of the corner of my eye, but little else (I did see a bird going over quite low, though, an ominous dark and silent shape against the sky, but I couldn’t tell you what it was for sure – vulture, heron or eagle in size, anyway.) For one ten-minute frame, I attached the Tamron 10-24mm lens at 10mm for a wide field, aiming towards the plane of the ecliptic solely to show the diverging curves that occur, though the wide field can still distort the trails unrealistically anyway. But while that one was going, I saw a distinct meteor cut right across its field of view. Cool! I finally had one that I knew was a meteor, and knew it was within the frame.

Except, when I got back and unloaded, it really wasn’t visible.

wide-angle long exposure of night sky showing diverging curves
The meteor was not dim, showing quite clearly against the stars, so it was at least their magnitude, and had a noticeable trail, not short – though it would have been reduced by the wider field of view. By my reckoning, it should have appeared in the upper left side of the frame (pretty damn close to the radiant of the alpha Capricornids as it were.) You can see some blotching up through just left of center, which does correspond to the position of the Milky Way at the time, even though I couldn’t make it out while there. The best I can say is that the meteor was aligned largely with the star trails and can’t be differentiated easily from them, though I’ve viewed the entire frame at full resolution and haven’t been able to find it. You may be looking at the one bright streak at upper left and thinking it’s too bright and too long, but here it is at full resolution:

full resolution inset of wide angle starfield
I didn’t directly measure it against its dim neighbors, and I’m not sure I could get an accurate length off of them anyway, but it’s damn close. And the distinct uniform brightness along the entire length isn’t a good sign, nor being that precisely parallel to the others. No, that’s a star. Maybe, at some later point, I’ll find the evidence that I was sure I captured, but who cares? It certainly wasn’t what I was after no matter what.

The moon had risen right around the time I’d arrived at the lake, but remained behind trees from my vantage, and wasn’t bright enough to make more than trivial contributions to the brightness of the haze, but upon returning home, I had a good view of it and decided not to waste the entire morning.

waning gibbous moon showing sunset within Maurolycus
That prominent crater down low on the terminator isn’t Tycho (which is off directly to the left of it, with the prominent ray pointing to it,) but Maurolycus, and yes, that’s sunset on the central peak – I could just barely discern this in the viewfinder, which told me that I was getting focus close. Still, I tweaked focus for every frame, knowing that critical sharpness is more a matter of chance that what can be determined through the viewfinder screen. White balance is set to Sunlight, so this is the color that was showing through the haze.

Maybe in a couple of days, I’ll aim for sunset on Tycho too, because why stop obsessing now?

*    *    *

Unrelated, but I’d mentioned waiting on a car window mount for a camera, which would have come in handy for this past trip to NY (well, both of them, though I hadn’t ordered it until after the first one.) After seventeen days in Greensboro, it finally left that facility (having been scanned as ‘leaving’ three times over two days) – only to arrive as a damaged, empty box. The staff and management at the Greensboro USPS Distribution Center is completely, utterly incompetent – this has been going on for years. Worse, the Inspector General knows about it, has audited multiple times, and it still goes on. Fucking hell, guys.

1 113 114 115 116 117 327